Agency, Gender, and Economic Development in the World Economy 1850–2000 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315212418-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s agency in historical family systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We look at a number of variables from the Ethnographic Atlas . Our choice for these variables is based on an overview of FCOWA written by Jan Kok (in press). In it, he discusses a number of family situations limiting women’s ability to make their own life-course decisions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We look at a number of variables from the Ethnographic Atlas . Our choice for these variables is based on an overview of FCOWA written by Jan Kok (in press). In it, he discusses a number of family situations limiting women’s ability to make their own life-course decisions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender inequitable beliefs are generally associated with all those dominant religions that are based on a deep patriarchal and hierarchical structureincluding the Judeo-Christian, Hindu, and Muslim traditionsand therefore impose specific behavioral prescriptions for men and women resulting in persistent gender models and stereotypes (Kok 2017).…”
Section: Religionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test whether the transmission of inequalities from parents to children is indeed influenced by norms on intrafamilial relationsincluding rules of inheritance, expectations regarding intrafamilial support, and the relative agency of womenthese familial arrangements need to be measured. Recently, several historical categorizations and specific measures of family systems across the globe have been developed (Carmichael & Rijpma, 2017;Duranton, Rodríguez-Pose, & Sandall, 2009;Kok, 2017;Rijpma & Carmichael, 2016;Szołtysek, Klüsener, Poniat, & Gruber, 2017;Szołtysek & Poniat, 2018). These, too, will enhance our understanding of social homogamy in the past.…”
Section: Thoughts On Pathways For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%