2002
DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.6.347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Withholding life prolonging treatment, and self deception

Abstract: Objectives: To compare non-treatment decision making by general practitioners and geriatricians in response to vignettes. To see whether the doctors' decisions were informed by ethical or legal reasoning. Design: Qualitative study in which consultant geriatricians and general practitioners (GPs) randomly selected from a list of local practitioners were interviewed. The doctors were asked whether patients described in five vignettes should be admitted to hospital for further care, and to give supporting reasons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The medical technologies are not, however, without cost. The cost includes huge medical fees and the long-term suffering of patients caused by the artificial prolongation of life (Kuo, 2002;Sayers & Perera, 2002). Even now, with the Law of Palliative Medicine, a complicated dying process that makes significant demands on the resources of the intensive care ward may represent death's most "modern form" in Taiwan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The medical technologies are not, however, without cost. The cost includes huge medical fees and the long-term suffering of patients caused by the artificial prolongation of life (Kuo, 2002;Sayers & Perera, 2002). Even now, with the Law of Palliative Medicine, a complicated dying process that makes significant demands on the resources of the intensive care ward may represent death's most "modern form" in Taiwan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, the representative of a ''passive'' type of intervention in the study-disconnection of a life support machinestill involves some action, in contrast to never starting a treatment (such as not inserting an endotracheal tube or not prescribing or administering an antibiotic). Physicians in various countries usually, [46][47][48] though not always, 49 consider withholding life sustaining treatment as different from, and more acceptable than, withdrawing it. Future studies can investigate the impact on acceptability of these gradations between an active and a passive role.…”
Section: Health Professionalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where an interviewer was present but GPs were given or shown scenarios and asked to give quantitative responses) were included. Studies investigating end of life decision making were excluded because of the many ethical, legal and societal issues inherent in these decisions which are unlikely to be present in the everyday clinical decisions made by GPs working in the community [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%