Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies

Abstract

BackgroundHealth-care quality in primary care depends largely on the appropriateness of General Practitioners’ (GPs; Primary Care or Family Physicians) decisions, which may be influenced by how difficult they perceive decisions to be. Patient scenarios (clinical or case vignettes) are widely used to investigate GPs’ decision making. This review aimed to identify the extent to which perceived decision difficulty, decision appropriateness, and their relationship have been assessed in scenario studies of GPs’ decision making; identify possible determinants of difficulty and appropriateness; and investigate the relationship between difficulty and appropriateness.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for scenario studies of GPs’ decision making. One author completed article screening. Ten percent of titles and abstracts were checked by an independent volunteer, resulting in 91% agreement. Data on decision difficulty and appropriateness were extracted by one author and descriptively synthesised. Chi-squared tests were used to explore associations between decision appropriateness, decision type and decision appropriateness assessment method.ResultsOf 152 included studies, 66 assessed decision appropriateness and five assessed perceived difficulty. While no studies assessed the relationship between perceived difficulty and appropriateness, one study objectively varied the difficulty of the scenarios and assessed the relationship between a measure of objective difficulty and appropriateness. Across 38 studies where calculations were possible, 62% of the decisions were appropriate as defined by the appropriateness standard used. Chi-squared tests identified statistically significant associations between decision appropriateness, decision type and decision appropriateness assessment method. Findings suggested a negative relationship between decision difficulty and appropriateness, while interventions may have the potential to reduce perceived difficulty.ConclusionsScenario-based research into GPs’ decisions rarely considers the relationship between perceived decision difficulty and decision appropriateness. The links between these decisional components require further investigation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0621-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Associations Among Practice Variation, Clinician Characteristics, and Care Algorithm Usage: A Multispecialty Vignette Study

“…The relationship between case difficulty and practice variation merits further study. 16 Finally, this study illustrates a new approach to the research of practice variation. First, the research team focused on variation itself rather than using a predefined standard of care; the team is aware of only one observational study using this approach.…”

“…high rates of nonadherence generally [13][14][15][16][17] and across clinician specialties, 18,19 and have identified improvements associated with specific interventions. 20,21 However, research examining unwarranted variation without using a predefined standard of appropriate care is lacking.…”

“…Performance on patient vignettes is strongly associated with clinical measures of care quality. 13,14 Vignette studies using predefined standards have found high rates of nonadherence generally 13-17 and across clinician specialties, 18,19 and have identified improvements associated with specific interventions. 20,21…”

The impact of chest computed tomography and chest radiography on clinical management of cystic fibrosis lung disease

“…In order to achieve this, we made use of a novel study design based on the repeated assessments of clinical vignettes. Such vignettes are more often in medicine, particularly in the field of medical education [21][22][23]. One previous study on the clinical management in CF also made use of clinical vignettes, but in this study the effects imaging techniques were not specifically investigated [24].…”

Individualized Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Older Adults and Their Primary Care Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…39 A recent systematic review suggests that as decision-making difficulty increases, decision appropriateness decreases. 40 Given the importance of physician recommendations, 13 providers' appropriate recommendations may be useful, particularly when patients either prefer screening but are unlikely to benefit or prefer to forgo screening but are likely to benefit. Interestingly, in a recent pilot study among older adults within the Veterans Affairs system, a clinical decision support tool to improve providers' appropriate CRC screening recommendations helped shift three of six individuals in whom screening was likely to be beneficial but who initially did not want screening and three of four who were unlikely to benefit but initially wanted screening.…”