The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.3389/fdigh.2017.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wiring the Past: A Network Science Perspective on the Challenge of Archeological Similarity Networks

Abstract: Nowadays, it is a common knowledge that scholars from different disciplines, regardless of the specificities of their research domains, can find in network science a valuable ally when tackling complexity. However, there are many difficulties that may arise, starting from the process of mapping a system onto a network which is not by any means a trivial step. This article deals with those issues inherent to the specific challenge of building a network from archeological data, focusing in particular on networks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied both Brainerd-Robinson's and Jaccard's similarity indexes to construct cultural similarity matrices of ornament assemblages -a step that is widely applied in the construction of archaeological networks (Peeples et al 2016). Following the recommendations of Prignano et al (2017), we first conducted an exploratory analysis to detect which similarity coefficient better represented our dataset. Brainerd-Robinson indices were calculated in R version 4.0.5 (Team 2013), using the script provided in Peeples (2011), including tables with the relative frequency of ornament types.…”
Section: 2-similarity Matrices and Network Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied both Brainerd-Robinson's and Jaccard's similarity indexes to construct cultural similarity matrices of ornament assemblages -a step that is widely applied in the construction of archaeological networks (Peeples et al 2016). Following the recommendations of Prignano et al (2017), we first conducted an exploratory analysis to detect which similarity coefficient better represented our dataset. Brainerd-Robinson indices were calculated in R version 4.0.5 (Team 2013), using the script provided in Peeples (2011), including tables with the relative frequency of ornament types.…”
Section: 2-similarity Matrices and Network Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These routes can be short or long, straight or circuitous, and can be connected to and nested in other routes. Simulations similar to these can explore various manifestations of one or more movement behaviors at a single point in time, for example focusing on understanding the consequences of uncertainties in data attributes [63][64][65] to assess the plausibility of routes.…”
Section: Summing Up and Making Connections: Track Graphs Pathway Systems And Path Framework Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where data is accessible to us through fragmented records with usually limited coverage in time and space [31]. Comparison between ETC models with different underlying diffusion networks could be used in this context to infer the pathways of cultural diffusion.…”
Section: December 17 2020 15/28mentioning
confidence: 99%