2018
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter feeding of elk in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and its effects on disease dynamics

Abstract: Providing food to wildlife during periods when natural food is limited results in aggregations that may facilitate disease transmission. This is exemplified in western Wyoming where institutional feeding over the past century has aimed to mitigate wildlife–livestock conflict and minimize winter mortality of elk (Cervus canadensis). Here we review research across 23 winter feedgrounds where the most studied disease is brucellosis, caused by the bacterium Brucella abortus. Traditional veterinary practices (vacci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 24% reduction in reproductive output is substantial, but a few caveats must be considered. That value applies to seropositive females and, with periodic exceptions, it is the minority of elk within any given herd in our study area that test seropositive for brucellosis (Cotterill et al., ). Except in herds with particularly high seroprevalence, the expected decline in pregnancy probability across the herds we studied should generally be below 7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A 24% reduction in reproductive output is substantial, but a few caveats must be considered. That value applies to seropositive females and, with periodic exceptions, it is the minority of elk within any given herd in our study area that test seropositive for brucellosis (Cotterill et al., ). Except in herds with particularly high seroprevalence, the expected decline in pregnancy probability across the herds we studied should generally be below 7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Data were collected in western Wyoming, south of Yellowstone National Park, USA, where supplementary winter feedgrounds are used by approximately 80% of the region's elk (Dean et al., ). The National Elk Refuge in Jackson, WY, is operated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and 22 additional feedgrounds are operated by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD; see Cotterill et al., ). Our data were collected by the WGFD for research and management purposes across all 23 feedgrounds and 2 nearby unfed wintering locations between 1995 and 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, supplemental feeding changes natural migration patterns (Peterson and Mesmer , Jones et al ) and increases stress levels (Patrek , Forristal et al ), both of which have implications for population vital rates (e.g., pregnancy rates, survival, and recruitment). Feedgrounds (i.e., high ungulate densities) also increase the potential for disease transmission and thus disease prevalence (Dean et al , Smith , Scurlock and Edwards , Smith , Cotterill et al ), which are significant concerns in regards to diseases such as brucellosis ( Brucella abortus ), which has been present in Wyoming elk for decades, and chronic wasting disease (Smith , , ; Scurlock and Edwards ; WGFD ), which was recently confirmed in a mule deer in Grand Teton National Park (~40 km from the Gros Ventre feedgrounds and ~5 km from the National Elk Refuge boundary). In theory, predators may assist with disease management by consuming diseased prey thus reducing transmission risk and prevalence by decreasing prey density across the landscape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%