Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter decomposition of transgenic cotton residue in conventional-till and no-till systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments with large mesh bags represent most accurately what happens in a natural field situation as they allow the whole soil invertebrate community to enter the litterbags and interact with each other. Our results are also in agreement with Lachnicht et al (2004) who found that Bt and non-Bt cotton decomposed similarly in the field. In contrast, we found that Bt maize decomposed faster than non-Bt maize in medium mesh bags, although when comparing single dates this was significant only for November.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 96%
“…Experiments with large mesh bags represent most accurately what happens in a natural field situation as they allow the whole soil invertebrate community to enter the litterbags and interact with each other. Our results are also in agreement with Lachnicht et al (2004) who found that Bt and non-Bt cotton decomposed similarly in the field. In contrast, we found that Bt maize decomposed faster than non-Bt maize in medium mesh bags, although when comparing single dates this was significant only for November.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 96%
“…Coviella et al (2000) showed no significant differences in N content of Bt cotton from that of non-Bt cotton. Lachnicht et al (2004) found that there was no substantial difference in nutrient content of the materials between Bt cotton and non-Bt cotton. Based on these findings, it is reasonable for Bt cotton to exert no apparent adverse impact on soil fauna.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This result is in agreement with Coviella et al (2000) who reported an undefined trend in the change of N content in Bt and non-Bt cotton. On the other hand, Lachnicht (2004) reported a decrease in % C as Bt cotton litter decomposed while % N remained unchanged; this was also observed by Donegan et al (1997). A decrease in % C has also been reported in decomposition studies of transgenic rice (Kimura et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%