2017
DOI: 10.1002/we.2132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind turbine performance decline in Sweden

Abstract: We show that Swedish wind turbines constructed before 2007 lose 0.15 capacity factor percentage points per year, corresponding to a lifetime energy loss of 6%. A gradual increase of downtime accounts for around one third of the deterioration and worsened efficiency for the remaining. Although the performance loss in Sweden is considerably smaller than previously reported in the UK, it is statistically significant and calls for a revision of the industry practice for wind energy calculations. The study is based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Allowing the gearbox to run to failure is indicated to be economically justified, showing that the gearbox has been quite robust and not the dominant factor in performance degradation. Finally, the results of the present work about wind turbine aging are more in line with those in [12] than in [14]: actually, if one extrapolates the present results to a twenty years period, the estimate agrees with [12]. It should be noted that, differently with respect to what observed in [12], the results of this study do not conform well to the hypothesis that the aging degradation is linear in time: actually, up to 7 years after the reference data set, the performance worsening is estimated to be of the order of 1%, while 10 years later the worsening reaches the 5%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Allowing the gearbox to run to failure is indicated to be economically justified, showing that the gearbox has been quite robust and not the dominant factor in performance degradation. Finally, the results of the present work about wind turbine aging are more in line with those in [12] than in [14]: actually, if one extrapolates the present results to a twenty years period, the estimate agrees with [12]. It should be noted that, differently with respect to what observed in [12], the results of this study do not conform well to the hypothesis that the aging degradation is linear in time: actually, up to 7 years after the reference data set, the performance worsening is estimated to be of the order of 1%, while 10 years later the worsening reaches the 5%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Another important consideration from the study in [12] is that this order of magnitude for the performance decline is remarkable but it is not disastrous because it is in line, for example, with gas turbine technology [13]. The study in [14] refers to wind turbines operating in Sweden, constructed before 2007. The methods and the results are different with respect to [12]: it arises that there is a 0.15 capacity factor percentage points per year decline, corresponding to a lifetime energy loss of 6%; this estimate is lower with respect to [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 ). Availability of WT deployed onshore tends to decrease with WT age 41 but is typically ≥98% (ref. 42 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixtyeight sites meet this data completeness criteria. It is important to note that application of these selection criteria is necessary 5 to ensuring the resulting IQR in CF estimates are robust, but it biases the resulting sample in two important ways; the overwhelming majority of these wind farms are located in Central Plains (Figure 3b) and they tend to represent older generation wind farms in which WT may no longer be under warrantee and may experience declining performance (Olauson et al, 2017), potential leading to inflation of IAV(CF). …”
Section: Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Onshore availability typically exceeds 98% (Carroll et al, 2017), but tends to decrease with WT age (Olauson et al, 2017). Thus gross CF derived from the WRF simulations that assume 100% WT availability (i.e.…”
Section: 2018) Annual Gross Capacity Factors (Cf) For Grid 15mentioning
confidence: 99%