2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-induced responses of tall buildings under combined aerodynamic control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researches stated that the structural optimisation of a tall building is greatly influenced by wind load [64][65][66] [67]. Besides, for tall buildings, the shape of the building plays a key role in controlling the effect of the wind load [68]. The above facts justify the emphasis on wind load in calculations and design of the PoC in this study.…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Many researches stated that the structural optimisation of a tall building is greatly influenced by wind load [64][65][66] [67]. Besides, for tall buildings, the shape of the building plays a key role in controlling the effect of the wind load [68]. The above facts justify the emphasis on wind load in calculations and design of the PoC in this study.…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…According to Holmes [19], Chamfered models reduce the across wind responses by 30% when compared to the model without modification. Corner-cuts performance is largely dependent on velocity [20], and also on location, where different terrains and different urban settings and neighboring buildings can have effects on turbulence of vortices [21]. One of the most demonstrative examples of using this configuration is the Taipei 101 tower in Taiwan, completed in 2004.…”
Section: Corner Softeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tall buildings, as per Xu et al (2014) are more prone to wind vibrations and receptive to dynamic loads. Further, Zheng et al (2018) stated that from the improvement of cross-section, the buildings enhance their wind resistance. Wind-induced accelerations, as mentioned by Farouk (2016) might cause discomfort to the occupants and so are taken into account as one of the most utility criteria whereas designing tall buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the many flow situations originating from the interaction of the wind with the structures, wind analysis is a task of high unconventionality if the building's plan is unusual. A collection of experimental and numerical work has been carried out to investigate wind-induced effects on isolated objects with various indifferent external shaped tall buildings, like Chakraborty et al (2014) and Raj and Ahuja (2013) have explored "+" shape buildings, Paul and Dalui (2016) investigated "Z" shape buildings, Gomes et al (2005) investigated "L" and "U" shape buildings, Mallick et al (2019) have studied "C" shape buildings, Li et al (2017) have examined "L" shaped buildings, Bhattacharyya et al (2014) have investigated "E" shape buildings, Nagar et al (2020) have analysed "H" shape buildings, Alminhana et al (2018) have considered "CAARC tall building model" with corner modifications, Bandi et al (2013) have investigated "Triangular" shape building with diverse configurations and Pal et al (2021) have investigated "Fish-plan Shape" model. The majority of researchers' interference studies, according to the existing literature, are aimed to determine the most useful configuration settings and/or interspacing among the obstructing models of rectangular or square plan shape buildings, as mentioned in the studies by Lam et al (2011), Hui et al (2012, Zu and Lam (2018a,b), Yu et al (2015), and Mara et al (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%