2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-020-0575-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widespread subsidence and carbon emissions across Southeast Asian peatlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forest carbon results reported here do not include measures of belowground carbon conservation in mineral soils or peatland, the latter of which stores more carbon than aboveground forest biomass in Borneo (35) and is particularly vulnerable to carbon loss and subsidence following deforestation events (36). We also do not include measures of forest regrowth in preserved areas or previously degraded areas being restored through intervention activities (37), which undoubtedly amplified carbon storage and sequestration benefits of the intervention.…”
Section: Villagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest carbon results reported here do not include measures of belowground carbon conservation in mineral soils or peatland, the latter of which stores more carbon than aboveground forest biomass in Borneo (35) and is particularly vulnerable to carbon loss and subsidence following deforestation events (36). We also do not include measures of forest regrowth in preserved areas or previously degraded areas being restored through intervention activities (37), which undoubtedly amplified carbon storage and sequestration benefits of the intervention.…”
Section: Villagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…InSAR-based subsidence measurement involves measuring phase changes in the reflected radar beam between subsequent passes of an observing satellite, allowing for millimeter-scale sensitivity to changes in elevation. We then estimated carbon fluxes associated with the subsidence data using the approach outlined by Hoyt et al (2020), as described further in Text S1 of the supporting information (Couwenberg & Hooijer, 2013;Leifeld et al, 2011;van den Akker et al, 2008;Van den Wyngaert, 2008). These estimates are not presented for use as emissions factors, but rather to provide a rough estimate of emissions associated with subsidence due to drainage; these estimates are uncertain due in part to the fact that subsidence rates are determined not only by oxidation, but also compaction, shrinkage, and consolidation of peat at lower depths (Hooijer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Subsidence Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mapping peatland drainage across the region for the first time, we find that subsidence rates (and associated carbon emissions) are higher in areas with progressively higher drainage density. To assess the effect of drainage on subsidence, we compared drainage density to subsidence rates measured from 2007 to 2011 (Hoyt et al, 2020), and found that High drainage density areas have median subsidence rates that are 1.3X larger than in Moderate drainage density areas, 1.5X larger than in Low drainage density areas, and 3.2X larger than in areas with no drainage ( Figure 6). This relationship holds even though drainage density data were measured 8 years after the subsidence measurements.…”
Section: Drainage Density Predicts Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, human-induced changes in effective stress, driven by excessive fluid production/injection operations in subsurface formations, occurs rapidly 20 . For instance, global overexploitation of groundwater from many giant aquifers, especially in northern China, India, Pakistan, Iran, and the United States (US), has caused vast land subsidence, fault reactivation, and induced seismicity 15 , 21 24 . In the US, 45 states with an area of more than 40,000 km 2 have been affected by extensive land subsidence due to the compaction of aquifers and the collapse of cavities in carbonates 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%