2008
DOI: 10.1080/00396330802601875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why War in Asia Remains Thinkable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the same logic, observers have been quick to interpret the ups and downs in Southeast Asia's bilateral disputes in the context of ostensive great-power strategies, including but not limited to those of China and the United States together with the latter's Asian allies (Storey 2011). Consequently, we are led to believe that Southeast Asia's significantly stable international order was the result of some type of overarching great-power balance (White 2008), a view that is both theoretically and empirically questionable. Unless one assumes that balance-of-power politics produced Southeast Asia's territorial peace by default, neither a macro-regional nor a global balancing logic can provide a satisfactory answer to the stability-despite-territorial-disputes puzzle.…”
Section: The Great Powersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same logic, observers have been quick to interpret the ups and downs in Southeast Asia's bilateral disputes in the context of ostensive great-power strategies, including but not limited to those of China and the United States together with the latter's Asian allies (Storey 2011). Consequently, we are led to believe that Southeast Asia's significantly stable international order was the result of some type of overarching great-power balance (White 2008), a view that is both theoretically and empirically questionable. Unless one assumes that balance-of-power politics produced Southeast Asia's territorial peace by default, neither a macro-regional nor a global balancing logic can provide a satisfactory answer to the stability-despite-territorial-disputes puzzle.…”
Section: The Great Powersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to White (2008), peace and stability in Asia Pacific can be maintained because of the US's role in doing what it is called as 'double reassurance' strategy. In this case, peace in the Asia Pacific, in what White called as post Vietnam order, emerged from the deal of the US double reassurance.…”
Section: Peace Security and Great Power Rivalry In Asia Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile for Chine itself, the concert would delay China's interest in getting regional primacy and put China to remain accepted the US role in the region. It also gives burden to China to acknowledge Japan's primacy and strategic role in the region meanwhile Japan in attempt to transform itself to be a credible regional strategic player (White, 2008).…”
Section: Great Power Concert Model In Asia Pacificmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 A third debate that this study evaluates is the likelihood of whether Asia will be pacific (or not) in the twenty-first century. 19 A conscious attempt will be made to relate the discussion to the central propositions in current academic literature, which can be summarized along the following lines. A significant proportion of the literature has highlighted the utility of nonmaterial variables, including liberal regime type, 20 socialization processes, norms, and identities.…”
Section: Major Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%