Proceedings of the 2000 International Workshop on System-Level Interconnect Prediction 2000
DOI: 10.1145/333032.333044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why interconnect prediction doesn't work

Abstract: Despite its long history, from Rent's rule [1] on, interconnect prediction is little used in industry.The most common implementation of interconnect prediction, the 'wireload model' used in synthesis, is almost universally scorned by the designers that use it. Even the canonical use of interconnect prediction, the decision of how many interconnect resources to put on a chip in the first place, is being replaced by experimentation over a set of existing designs. CAD companies are scrambling to replace any remai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some popular algorithms such as min-cut placement and simulated annealing tend to produce very different placement solutions from run to run. Therefore information about timing-critical nets and nets that failed to route may be invalidated (similar reasons hamper interconnect prediction [19]). To facilitate incremental improvement of layout, we propose to stabilize placements from run to run.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some popular algorithms such as min-cut placement and simulated annealing tend to produce very different placement solutions from run to run. Therefore information about timing-critical nets and nets that failed to route may be invalidated (similar reasons hamper interconnect prediction [19]). To facilitate incremental improvement of layout, we propose to stabilize placements from run to run.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WLMs are generally perceived to be inaccurate and to be inadequate for good optimization [7,8]. The traditional wisdom is that inaccuracy of WLMs will worsen as die sizes expand and feature sizes shrink, and wire loads become more dominant over pin loads (and less predictable).…”
Section: "Wlms Considered Harmful"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SLIP-2000 paper [8], Scheffer and Nequist make several compelling arguments as to why interconnect estimation (for which WLMs are just one exemplar) can never be successful. Order statistics arguments are used to justify the EDA industry shift to constructive (= global routing based) interconnect estimation: noisy estimators that are used to predict average-or sum-based metrics (e.g., total wire length) may be reasonably useful, but noisy estimators that are used to predict maximum-or minimum-based metrics (e.g., worst-case slack over all timing paths, or worst-case overcongestion over all global routing grids) will have large errors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3] fast placement was used as an early timing feedback model for improved technology mapping. A possible reason for the poor exploration of our topic is [9]: this paper discourages interconnect prediction stating that the critical path is determined by the exceptional long wires, which are difficult to estimate. However, Monte Carlo simulations include these exceptions in a reasonably accurate way (see Section III).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%