2016
DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v9n6p112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Dissatisfied Mobile Subscribers Stay: Role of Service Use Experience, Commitment and Corporate Reputation

Abstract: This paper examines the extent to which service use experience, commitment and perceived positive corporate reputation affect loyalty behaviour of dissatisfied stayers in mobile telephony context. Drawing on relationship marketing and switching behaviour literature a conceptual framework was developed and tested using partial least square structural equation modelling. The proposed model was validated with data from 736 subscribers of six global providers of telecommunication services. Results show that commit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong relationship is demonstrated by a set of behavioral indicators that reflect relationship firmness, magnitude, value and interactivity between customers and their service providers that evolve over time. Relationship strength is a multifaceted construct that are typically summarized by relationship dimensions including length (i.e., age; Wong et al, 2018), depth (i.e., frequency and use intensity; Dagger et al, 2009), and width (range of purchased services; Mbawuni and Nimako, 2016). Though relationship strength has long been recognized in relationship marketing research (Storbacka et al, 1994), the majority of studies operationalized relationship quality as the only determinant of relational outcomes while the few published studies on relationship strength were exceedingly focused on B2B service contexts (Barry et al, 2008), presumably due to the limited sets of customers and the availability of dedicated account managers when compared to B2C relationships.…”
Section: Relationship Strength In Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong relationship is demonstrated by a set of behavioral indicators that reflect relationship firmness, magnitude, value and interactivity between customers and their service providers that evolve over time. Relationship strength is a multifaceted construct that are typically summarized by relationship dimensions including length (i.e., age; Wong et al, 2018), depth (i.e., frequency and use intensity; Dagger et al, 2009), and width (range of purchased services; Mbawuni and Nimako, 2016). Though relationship strength has long been recognized in relationship marketing research (Storbacka et al, 1994), the majority of studies operationalized relationship quality as the only determinant of relational outcomes while the few published studies on relationship strength were exceedingly focused on B2B service contexts (Barry et al, 2008), presumably due to the limited sets of customers and the availability of dedicated account managers when compared to B2C relationships.…”
Section: Relationship Strength In Bankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A precise estimation of the switching costs is imperative for the setting of corporate strategies and regulatory policies since it has a fundamental impact on consumers’ behavior especially in competitive markets. Marketers and managers can intensify the retention of dissatisfied customers by increasing the switching costs and the positive reputation of the company (Eberle, Milan, & de Matos, 2016; Mbawuni and Nimako, 2016; Zhu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main reasons that keep dissatisfied customers from switching to another service provider in the telecommunication industry and in B2B businesses, the first reason is high switching costs as perceived by customers and the second reason is the high positive reputation of their current provider; therefore, marketers and managers can intensify the retention of dissatisfied customers by increasing the switching costs and the positive reputation of the company (Eberle et al, 2016; Mbawni and Nimako, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%