White lupine yield under different sowing densities and row spacings

Santi, Antônio Luis; Corassa, Geomar Mateus; Gaviraghi, Ronei; Martin, Thomas Newton; Bisognin, M.B.; Flora, Lisandra Pinto Della

doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n10p903-907

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As reported by Lopez-Bellido et al (2000), the plant density (20-60 cm) did not have a significant impact on white lupin yielding, while Santi et al (2016) claims that in Brazil the optimal density is 25 plants, in the Czech Republic, according to Šariková et al (2011), 75 plants, and in Poland according to Borowska et al (2017), Faligowska et al (2018, Prusiński (2002) -70-80 plants per m 2 , which is slightly more than reported by Băbuțiu and David (2010) and Podleśny (2007), 50 and 60 plants more per 1 m 2 , respectively. A higher plant density decreases the number of pods per plant (Podleśny 2007, Borowska et al 2017.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 51%

“…One of the reasons for abandoning or limiting the cultivation of legumes is a considerable yielding variation (Annicchiarico et al 2018, Reckling et al 2018, even though the share of legumes in the crop structure is commonly desired as it enhances succeeding crops yielding. In Brazil white lupin is considered an important alternative crop used for a recovery of degraded soils and sowing it increases succeeding crops yielding, including maize (Santi et al 2016). According to Lucas et al (2015), lupins, similarly as other legumes, can become an alternative for the imported soybean in Europe.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of the interrow width and plant density on the yielding of white lupin

Prusiński

2021

AFSci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study investigated a Polish white lupin ‘Butan’, and its yielding depending on the interrow width and plant density.The mean many-year lupin seed yield was 3.05 t ha-1 and it strongly depended on the total rainfall and total temperature over the generative plant development. The mean discrepancy in the seed yield across the research years, due to a considerable variation in the total rainfall, ranged from 1.59 t ha-1 to 7.43 t ha-1. There was no significant effect of the factors applied on white lupin yielding. Only the number of pods per plant depended on the factors and it was significantly higher when lupin was grown in narrow rows, with the lowest plant density. Also, HI and SPAD values were significantly higher for 16 cm row width. The LAI value did not depend significantly on neither of the two factors. Content and yield of protein depended proportionally on the sum and distribution of precipitation in the following years.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 51%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of the interrow width and plant density on the yielding of white lupin

Prusiński

2021

AFSci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, choosing sown species can be interesting to reach one or several specific services, such as long-term SOM improvement with grasses, N-fixation or rapid decomposition for N supply using legumes (Guerra and Steenwerth, 2012). Sowing density and spatial structure form levers which can be used to reduce competition with grapevines, or to favour biomass production (Santi et al, 2016). Spatial structure refers to service crop location in the field: full surface, only rows or inter-rows, one inter-row out of two or more (Figure 3).…”

Section: Service Crop Strategy Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management of service crops for the provision of ecosystem services in vineyards: A review

Garcia

Celette

Gary

et al. 2018

Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

168

110

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Service crops are crops grown with the aim of providing non-marketed ecosystem services, i.e. differing from food, fiber and fuel production. Vineyard soils face various agronomic issues such as poor organic carbon levels, erosion, fertility losses, and numerous studies have highlighted the ability of service crops to address these issues. In addition to their ability to increase soil organic matter and fertility, and reduce runoff and erosion processes, service crops provide a large variety of ecosystem services in vineyards such as weed control, pest and disease regulation, water supply, water purification, improvement of field trafficability and maintenance of soil biodiversity. However, associating service crops with grapevines may also generate disservices and impair grape production: competition for soil resources with the grapevine is often highlighted to reject such association. Consequently, vinegrowers have to find a balance between services and disservices, depending on local soil and climate conditions, on their objectives of grape production and on the nature and temporality of the ecosystem services they expect during the grapevine cycle. This study proposes a review of the services and disservices provided by service crops in vineyards, and a framework for their management. Vinegrowers' production objectives and pedoclimatic constraints form the preliminary stage to consider before defining a strategy of service crop management. This strategy assembles management options such as the choice of species, its spatial distribution within the vineyard, the timing of its installation, maintenance and destruction. These management options, defined for both annual and long-term time scales, form action levers which may impact cropping system functioning. Finally, we underline the importance of implementing an adaptive strategy at the seasonal time scale. Such tactical management allows adapting the cropping system to observed climate and state of the biophysical system during the grapevine cycle, in order to provide targeted services and achieve satisfactory production objectives.

show abstract

“…Studies carried out by Abreu et al (2005) and Silva et al (2012) revealed that the increase of the plant population of white oat resulted in an increased crop growth rate and biomass productivity per unitarea. Santi et al (2016) observed increased productivity of lupine biomass by increasing sowing density. The total biomass productivity also denominated biological productivity is directly linked to the photosynthesis and breathing processes in the vegetative and reproductive phases (Demétrio et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 76%

The sowing density on oat productivity indicators

Romitti¹,

Dornelles²,

Silva³

et al. 2017

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The sowing density adjustment in oatcan maximize the productivity expression.The aim of this study is to define the behavior of productivity expression of biomass, grains, straw andharvest indexthrough increasing sowing density in the main biotype cultivated in Southern Brazil. It proposesthe possibility of indicating higher sowing density to the productivity maximization of biomass and grains.With the densityadjusted to the grain productivity to simulate the reflexes on the biological and straw productivity and harvest index compared to recommendeddensity, considering high and reduced tillering cultivars in different succession systems.The study was carried out in 2013, 2014 and 2015 in randomized blockdesign with four replications in a 4 × 2 factorial scheme, for sowing density (100, 200, 300, 600 and 900 m -2 ) and oat cultivars (Brisasul and URS Taura), respectively, in the corn/oat and soybean/oat succession system.With the increase in sowing density, the biological and straw productivity evidence alinear behavior and the grain productivity and harvest index ofquadratic behavior, regardless of the cultivar,agricultural year and succession system. It is possible to indicate a higher sowing density to the biomass and grain productivity maximization with sowing density close to 500 seeds m -2 in the main succession systems.In high and reduced tillering cultivars, the adjusted density compared tothe recommended increasedthe biological and straw productivity, regardless of agricultural year and succession systems.

show abstract

White lupine yield under different sowing densities and row spacings

Cited by 7 publications

References 15 publications

Effect of the interrow width and plant density on the yielding of white lupin

Effect of the interrow width and plant density on the yielding of white lupin

Management of service crops for the provision of ecosystem services in vineyards: A review

The sowing density on oat productivity indicators

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About