2012
DOI: 10.5267/j.dsl.2012.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which product would be chosen? A fuzzy VIKOR method for evaluation and selection of products in terms of customers' point of view; Case study: Iranian cell phone market

Abstract: Product selection is always one of the troubles that decision makers are facing with it. Correct selection requires having suitable method for this important issue. In this article, we concern to introduce an approach of fuzzy decision making for selection to decision makers. The nature of decision making is usually complex and without structure. Totally, most of qualitative and quantitative factors such as quality, price, and flexibility should be concerned for determining a suitable product. In this study, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, ν here means the weight of the strategy of the maximum group utility (Wu et al, 2009). For more details of the implementation of this method, interested readers are referred to Yadollahi Farsi et al (2012).…”
Section: Fig1 Feedback System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, ν here means the weight of the strategy of the maximum group utility (Wu et al, 2009). For more details of the implementation of this method, interested readers are referred to Yadollahi Farsi et al (2012).…”
Section: Fig1 Feedback System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yadollahi Farsi et al (2012) introduced a technique of fuzzy decision making for ranking various alternatives by using recent advances in ranking methods for product selection. The proposed study applied oral preferences language stated in terms of triangular and trapezoid fuzzy numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the present case is similar to decision making under uncertainty with the availability of various dependent parameters, a suitable multiple attribute decision making (MADM) with fuzzy logic approach could be used (Mittal, Tewari, & Khanduja, 2017a). Various MADM approaches such as TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) (Chen, 2000;Hwang et al, 1993;Mittal et al, 2016;Rathi et al, 2015), VIKOR (VlseKriterijumskaOptimisacija I KompromisnoResenje) (Liu et al, 2012;Opricovic & Tzeng, 2004;Yadollahi Farsi et al, 2012), AHP (Mittal et al, 2017b;Saaty, 1990) and SAW (simple additive weighting) (Chen & Klein, 1997) etc. are available but in this case study TOPSIS was selected as it was best suited for similar case scenarios.…”
Section: Fuzzy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has provided excellent results in complex decision-making problems in engineering (Zeki Ayağ & Özdemir, 2006;Vats & Vaish, 2013;Zhang, 2004). MADM utilized a lot of methods in literature which includes TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) (Chen, 2000;Farsijani et al, 2015), VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimisacija I Kompromisno Resenje) (Opricovic & Tzeng, 2004;Yadollahi Farsi et al, 2012), and AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) (Chang, 1996;Kahraman et al, 2003), SAW (simple additive weighting) (Chen & Klein, 1997), etc.…”
Section: Capacity Designmentioning
confidence: 99%