1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02691958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When job “openings” weren’t: Estimates of the extent of informal network hiring in sociology, 1965–1972

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Informal contacts between members of an organisation have frequently been a subject of research. Such research tends to be on the effect of the context on the dynamics of the contact (Salzinger, 1982; Feld, 1981; Van de Bunt, 1999); on the influence of characteristics of members on the different types of contacts (Lincoln and Miller, 1979), or on particular applications, for example examinations of the availability of career opportunities within a field (Granovetter, 1974; Wright, 1993). However, most studies of relationships between organisational members tend to focus strictly on work‐related contacts (Allen, 1984; Badaracco, 1991; Biemans, 1992; Devlin and Bleackly, 1988; Eccles and Nohria, 1992; Tushman, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informal contacts between members of an organisation have frequently been a subject of research. Such research tends to be on the effect of the context on the dynamics of the contact (Salzinger, 1982; Feld, 1981; Van de Bunt, 1999); on the influence of characteristics of members on the different types of contacts (Lincoln and Miller, 1979), or on particular applications, for example examinations of the availability of career opportunities within a field (Granovetter, 1974; Wright, 1993). However, most studies of relationships between organisational members tend to focus strictly on work‐related contacts (Allen, 1984; Badaracco, 1991; Biemans, 1992; Devlin and Bleackly, 1988; Eccles and Nohria, 1992; Tushman, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%