2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When do recycling attitudes predict recycling? An investigation of self-reported versus observed behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
78
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
8
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, only about 31% of respondents reported that their households had recycled paper, glass, metal, or plastic in the past three months-a rate that is equal to the national average for the UK [14], and marginally higher than the rate in multi-residential buildings in Ontario (Canada) [13]. However, considering social desirability bias and the tendency for self-reported recycling to be overstated, the actual rate of recycling in Equestria is likely to be lower [1,13,14,37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, only about 31% of respondents reported that their households had recycled paper, glass, metal, or plastic in the past three months-a rate that is equal to the national average for the UK [14], and marginally higher than the rate in multi-residential buildings in Ontario (Canada) [13]. However, considering social desirability bias and the tendency for self-reported recycling to be overstated, the actual rate of recycling in Equestria is likely to be lower [1,13,14,37,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the fact that respondents filled in the measures of recycling attitudes in a socially desirable way may be considered as a limiting factor. Other researchers have noted that recycling attitudes often differ from actual recycling behaviors (Huffman et al, 2014;Thøgersen, 2014); and it is difficult to solve this divide by using self-report measures; ho wever, further research could be carried out using more discrete In summary, it can be concluded that on its own the theory of planned behavior is a strong and time-tested model of predicting behavior (Ajzen, 2011), but it neglects the moral component wich, as evident by the present study, can be a strong predictor of behavior as well. It would be not only reasonable, but also wise to include moral norms in the theory of planned behavior as a predictor of behavioral intention and perhaps behavior as well (at least in the case of recycling).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers strive to understand what drives sustainable behavior as a whole (Ballantyne & Packer, 2005, 2011Iveroth & Bengtsson, 2014;Peters, Sinclair, & Fudge, 2012;Sahin, Ertepinar, & Teksoz, 2012), while others focus on specific behaviors that might contribute to saving or preserving the natural environment (Young, Hwang, McDonald, & Oates, 2010;Jakovcevic & Steg, 2013;Liu, Wang, Shishime, & Fujitsuka, 2012;Spence, Leygue, Bedwell, & O'Malley, 2014). One common behavior that contributes to sustainability is recycling (Chan & Bishop, 2013;Huffman, Van Der Werff, Henning, & Watrous-Rodriguez, 2014;Tonglet, Phillips, & Read, 2004;Wan, Shen, & Yu, 2014). Most people have the means to recycle trash, therefore, understanding what motivates this behavior may bring us closer to the ways of effectively encouraging it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measurement of behaviour improves the reliability of the study, given that discordance between self-reported and actual measures is noted in past environmental research (Chao & Lam, 2011;Huffman, Van Der Werff, Henning & Watrous-Rodriguez, 2014). This also helps to reduce the issue of common method variance (CMV), which is highlighted as an issue in cross-sectional survey research (Rindfleisch, Malter, Ganesan, & Moorman, 2008).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 91%