When Different Types of Education Matter

Abstract

Using longitudinal data for a nationally representative sample of ninth graders in South Korea, we examine socioeconomic differences in the likelihood of making transitions into different types of high school and college with a goal of testing the validity of the effectively maintained inequality hypothesis. We find significant socioeconomic disparities in the likelihood of attending an academic high school and a 4-year university. However, the predicted probabilities suggest that even disadvantaged students typically choose an academic high school relative to a vocational high school. Furthermore, although disadvantaged students likely end up with a 2-year junior college, those disadvantaged students graduating from an academic high school typically choose a 4-year university, after controlling for academic achievement and other variables. We discuss the relevance of the effectively maintained inequality hypothesis for South Korea and broad implications for elsewhere where postsecondary education is increasingly available for the majority of population.

The horizontal stratification of the Catalonian university system: the role of the private university

“…In the UK, there are examples of how the increased number of students is absorbed by the less prestigious universities-those who play a more "inclusive" role in the system-enabling the "old universities" to maintain their selective position (Boliver, 2011(Boliver, , 2013Iannelli, Gamoran, & Paterson, 2011;Raffe & Croxford, 2015;Triventi, 2013). The same pattern can be observed for many other countries worldwide, possibly because of the internationalisation of the Anglo-Saxon model -see for example, China (Liu, 2018;Luo, Guo, & Shi, 2018), Korea (Byun & Park, 2017), Peru (Wells, Cuenca, Blanco Ramirez, & Aragón, 2018), the USA, Brazil, and others (Scott, Gallacher, & Parry, 2016).…”

Exploring urban housing disadvantages and economic struggles in Seoul, South Korea

“…In the context of Korea, the issue of income and wealth disparities has garnered significant attention since the Asian financial crisis in 1997. Studies have identified various factors contributing to poverty in Korean society, including unequal opportunities, educational inequalities, and regional disparities 15,26,27 . These factors restrict individuals' prospects for upward mobility, perpetuating a vicious cycle of poverty, particularly within lowincome communities.…”

Exploring Vulnerability in Urban Areas: Housing and Living Poverty in Seoul, South Korea

“…In the context of Korea, the issue of income and wealth disparities has garnered signi cant attention since the Asian nancial crisis. Studies have identi ed various factors contributing to poverty in Korean society, including unequal opportunities, educational inequalities, and regional disparities (Byun and Park, 2017;Han, 2022aHan, , 2022b). These factors restrict individuals' prospects for upward mobility, perpetuating a vicious cycle of poverty, particularly within low-income communities.…”