2016
DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1145181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s Gender Got to Do With It? Sexual Double Standards and Power in Heterosexual College Hookups

Abstract: Although college hookups are typically enjoyable for both men and women, heterosexual hookups often involve inequitable power dynamics that privilege men (e.g., women perform sexual acts to please partners and/or succumb to pressure for intercourse). Some scholars have attributed this power imbalance to the traditional double standard. However, recent studies have indicated college students typically endorse egalitarian standards-and some endorse a reverse double standard in which they negatively judge men mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Abstinence‐only sex education discourse tends to position sex in this manner by reinforcing messages about maintaining one's “value” by avoiding sex until marriage (particularly for women) . Although sexual double standards are not new, some have argued that contemporary young adults and college students do not endorse these traditional views . Our participants still seem to endorse these cultural norms, which seem, in turn, to influence consent communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abstinence‐only sex education discourse tends to position sex in this manner by reinforcing messages about maintaining one's “value” by avoiding sex until marriage (particularly for women) . Although sexual double standards are not new, some have argued that contemporary young adults and college students do not endorse these traditional views . Our participants still seem to endorse these cultural norms, which seem, in turn, to influence consent communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Researchers have not explicitly examined the extent to which these gender and cultural norms influence consent communication among college students. Thus, despite the extensive work examining sexual double standards, an exploratory analysis in the context of consent communication would be fruitful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the empowerment of women and their growing concern about, and awareness of, sexual violence, woman-favorable SDS has emerged (Kettrey, 2016;Milhausen & Herold, 2002), which is the opposite to man-favorable SDS. Indeed woman-favorable SDS defends more sexual freedom for women than for men (Álvarez-Muelas et al, 2019;Papp et al, 2015;Sakaluk & Milhausen 2012;Sánchez-Fuentes et al, 2020;Thompson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avoidance of such criticism is paramount to the success of sexual assault prevention programs. This is because adolescents and young adults who are coming of age in a “post‐feminist” era are likely to reject gendered explanations of sexual assault and, instead, respond more positively to gender‐neutral programs that use inclusive language that can be applied to a broad range of victims and perpetrators (Barreto & Ellemers, 2005; Kettrey, 2016; Swim, Aikin, Hall, & Hunter, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%