What matters for knowledge work productivity?

Abstract

Purpose Knowledge work productivity is a well-studied topic in the existing literature, but it has focussed mainly on two things. First, there are many theoretical models lacking empirical research, and second, there is a very specific research regarding how something impacts productivity. The purpose of this paper is to collect empirical data and test the conceptual model of knowledge work productivity in practice. The paper also provides information on how different drivers of knowledge work productivity have an impact on productivity. Design/methodology/approach Through the survey method, data were collected from 998 knowledge workers from Finland. Then, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to confirm the knowledge work productivity dimensions of the conceptual model. Later, regression analysis was used to analyse the impacts of knowledge factors on productivity. Findings This paper increases the understanding of what matters for knowledge work productivity, with statistical analysis. The conceptual model of knowledge work productivity consists of two major elements: the knowledge worker and the work environment. The study results showed that the knowledge worker has the biggest impact on productivity through his or her well-being and work practices. The social environment was also found to be a significant driver. The results could not confirm or refute the role of the physical or virtual environment in knowledge work productivity. Practical implications The practical value of the study lies in the analysis results. The information generated about the factors impacting productivity can be used to improve knowledge work productivity. In addition, the limited resources available for organisational development will have the greatest return if they are used to increase intangible assets, i.e., management and work practices. Originality/value While it is well known that many factors are essential for knowledge work productivity, relatively few studies have examined it from as many dimensions at the same time as this study. This study adds value to the literature by providing information on which factors have the greatest influence on productivity.

Optimizing the relationship between job autonomy and knowledge workers’ satisfaction: The roles of crafting and value congruence

“…While leisure satisfaction, a positive feeling derived from leisure activities (Beard and Ragheb, 1980;Kuykendall, Tay and Ng 2015), has received less attention. It is found that both job and leisure satisfaction are related to knowledge workers' job performance and turnover intentions (Allen, Bryant and Vardaman 2010;Palvalin 2019;Yigitcanlar, Baum and Horton 2007). Consequently, employers, particularly those in rapidly growing economies like China, are exploring new tactics for improving satisfaction levels in their knowledge workforce (Fish 2015).…”

Investigasi Empirik Determinasi Beban Kerja dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi dan Produktivitas Kerja

“…Memahami pengetahuan produktivitas kerja dan penggeraknya secara lebih komprehensif telah menjadi masalah yang cukup topikal karena konsep cara kerja yang baru (Palvalin, 2019).…”

Knowledge Work in the Library

“…Though it may seem obvious that KWs use knowledge, there have been several—often competing—attempts to articulate exactly what this means (Pyöriä, 2005; Palvalin, 2019). It has been used synonymously with “white collar” work (Okkenen, 2004), associated with highly qualified and talented individuals (Costas & Karreman, 2016), and used as a catch‐all term for the future of work.…”