2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-017-9281-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is Working, What is Not, and What We Need to Know: a Meta-Analytic Review of Business Ethics Instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, regarding the importance of students' active participation in business ethics/CSR programmes, courses should have a clear focus and avoid dispersion, including a diversity of relatively short and frequent-both individual and group-based-practice activities. These ideas are consistent with the suggestions by Medeiros et al [74], who state that business ethics courses should narrow their focus and choose just between one and three main goals: in general, providing short, focused training may be the most beneficial approach for improving ethical decision making and ethical behaviour. However, caution is advised regarding business ethics instruction programme development, as participants with prior exposure to instruction in ethics may not show the same gains as those who are exposed to such material for the first time [71].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, regarding the importance of students' active participation in business ethics/CSR programmes, courses should have a clear focus and avoid dispersion, including a diversity of relatively short and frequent-both individual and group-based-practice activities. These ideas are consistent with the suggestions by Medeiros et al [74], who state that business ethics courses should narrow their focus and choose just between one and three main goals: in general, providing short, focused training may be the most beneficial approach for improving ethical decision making and ethical behaviour. However, caution is advised regarding business ethics instruction programme development, as participants with prior exposure to instruction in ethics may not show the same gains as those who are exposed to such material for the first time [71].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Besides, not only topics covered should be considered, but also the relevant teaching and learning processes and class dynamics involved. Accordingly, Medeiros et al () found that students' active participation through, for example, presentations and class discussions, considerably improves business ethics course effectiveness. Moreover, stand alone, workshop‐based training lasting around 1 day proved more effective than integrated and semester‐long training, as were face to face courses versus online education (Medeiros et al, ).…”
Section: Teaching Business Ethics In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, overload with texts can limit time necessary for processing the crucial content of the course profoundly, and learning how to apply it so that students may achieve crucial competences (Goldstein & Ford, 2002). Research suggests that training and course designers should limit courses to approximately four to seven key topics, like general and institutional compliance, decision-making strategies, stakeholders, and ethical dilemma characteristics, which are particularly important to influence ethical behavior and decision-making (Medeiros et al, 2017). Still, we must allow students to see the personal relevance of such goals (comparing their own goals to those of other students) and make them part of their social identity (as citizens or future company leaders).…”
Section: Insights From Educational Psychology: Cognitive Applicativementioning
confidence: 99%