2010
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Is Sociological about Music?

Abstract: The sociology of music has become a vibrant field of study in recent decades. While its proponents are well aware of this field"s contributions and relevance, we focus here on demonstrating its merit to the broader sociological community. We do so by addressing the following questions: What is music, sociologically speaking? How do individuals and groups use music? How is the collective production of music made possible? How does music relate to broader social distinctions, especially class, race, and gender? … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(96 reference statements)
2
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Musicians are located in physical places that are populated by musical genres and musical instruments, with some genre and instruments more central to those places than others. Given that genres spawn communities of similarly oriented musicians and fans (Lena, 2012;Roy & Dowd, 2010), musicians who claim central genres in a given locale could have a greater potential for social capital than those who claim peripheral genres, as the former are able to tap into the networks of connections (including those of working musicians) that undergird such genre centrality. Similarly, those playing central instruments (e.g., piano) in a given locale may have many potential and connected colleagues sharing comparable musical concerns, while those playing peripheral instruments may lack such a ready-made grouping.…”
Section: Controls: Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Musicians are located in physical places that are populated by musical genres and musical instruments, with some genre and instruments more central to those places than others. Given that genres spawn communities of similarly oriented musicians and fans (Lena, 2012;Roy & Dowd, 2010), musicians who claim central genres in a given locale could have a greater potential for social capital than those who claim peripheral genres, as the former are able to tap into the networks of connections (including those of working musicians) that undergird such genre centrality. Similarly, those playing central instruments (e.g., piano) in a given locale may have many potential and connected colleagues sharing comparable musical concerns, while those playing peripheral instruments may lack such a ready-made grouping.…”
Section: Controls: Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction is reinforced by the fact that the latter companies hardly deal with the release of non-commercial an unprofitable music. By responding to genres outside the mainstream supply, small record companies create opportunities to enter into competition with the majors and to contribute to the diversity of contemporary music (Peterson andBerger 1975, Dowd andRoy 2010). Especially the interactive internet may play an important role, by the mostly free dissemination and promotion of music (Oliver 2010).…”
Section: Diy Motives Genres and Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Music is perceived as a rather fixed object of study. Following Small (1998) and Roy and Dowd (2010), we perceive (the experience of) live music as an activity not as an object, an activity laden with emotions and concrete individual and collective meaning going beyond traditional disciplinary boundaries. Therefore, we need to review the look at emotions and meaning resulting from the music experience.…”
Section: A Growing Field Of Study In Need Of New Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%