What drives users’ participation in online social Q&A communities? An empirical study based on social cognitive theory

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine some drivers of users’ participation in online social question-and-answer (Q&A) communities based on social cognitive theory and then identify the underlying mechanism of this process. Design/methodology/approach This study developed a research model to test the proposed hypotheses, and an online survey was employed to collected data. Totally, 313 valid responses were collected, and partial least squares structural equation modeling was adopted to analyze these data. Findings This study empirically finds that the outcome expectations (personal outcome expectations and knowledge self-management outcome expectations) are positively related to participation in online social Q&A communities. At the same time, users’ self-efficacy positively influences their participation behaviors. It can not only directly motivate users’ participation, but also indirectly promote participation behaviors through the two dimensions of outcome expectations. Besides, perceived expertise and perceived similarity are two positive and significant environmental elements affecting users’ participation. Originality/value This study extends the understanding about how participation behaviors will be motivated in the context of online social Q&A communities. Drawing on the social cognitive theory, constructs were established based on the features of these communities. Meanwhile, some mediating effects in the motivating process were also discussed.

Unconscious or conscious? The impacts of habit and social support receipt on older adults' continued participation in online health communities

“…, 2016). Under the conscious/rational perspective, the positive expectation will increase users' willingness toward continued participation (Bao and Han, 2019). However, in the context of OHC, data from Wang et al.…”

“…As for the relationships between indirect social support receipt and users' continued behavior, research on social support exchange in disaster has shown that observing social support can increase peoples' expected support, which means the expectation that social support would be provided when needed (Drury et al, 2016). Under the conscious/rational perspective, the positive expectation will increase users' willingness toward continued participation (Bao and Han, 2019). However, in the context of OHC, data from Wang et al (2017) suggested that indirect informational support receipt is negatively associated with users' continued participation, and indirect emotional support receipt is not related to users' continued participation.…”

Influential Factors and the Realization Mechanism of Sustainable Information-Sharing in Virtual Communities from a Knowledge Fermenting Perspective

“…Specifically, many researchers have explored the information-sharing motivation, incentive mechanisms, and influential factors that shape the participants' information-sharing behaviors. They applied various theories such as the theory of planned behavior (Lin et al, 2018), social capital theory (Zhang et al, 2017), social cognitive theory (Bao & Han, 2019), social influence theory (Chou et al, 2015), and social exchange theory (Mpinganjira, 2018).…”

Convergências entre a teoria da troca social e a mediação da informação e do conhecimento na perspectiva dos desenvolvedores de software

“…Referente à questão 7, quando inquiridos se o motivo principal de compartilhar informação e conhecimento seria uma satisfação pessoal, novamente, a maioria foi positiva: 58,3% concordaram plenamente e 33,3% parcialmente, não havendo discordâncias. Argumenta-se que essa postura pode ser decorrente tanto de valores pessoais que o sujeito incorporou ao longo da vida, como também consequência de um senso desenvolvido de autoeficácia, que é a crença na própria capacidade de realização e construção de conhecimento (BANDURA, 1978;BAO;HAN, 2019).…”