2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-008-9538-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What does decision support mean to the climate change research community?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Global Change Research Program's new strategic plan calling for more use-inspired research, any substantive changes are yet to be seen, which would support more RISA-like research. Science policies have been slow to support the growing need for usable climate information, echoing earlier criticisms made about the program [11,[27][28][29]. Conducting basic research aimed at contributing to our fundamental knowledge about climate change will always play a critical role in climate science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Change Research Program's new strategic plan calling for more use-inspired research, any substantive changes are yet to be seen, which would support more RISA-like research. Science policies have been slow to support the growing need for usable climate information, echoing earlier criticisms made about the program [11,[27][28][29]. Conducting basic research aimed at contributing to our fundamental knowledge about climate change will always play a critical role in climate science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kloprogge and van der Sluijs (2006, p. 365) state that "stakeholder reasoning, observation and imagination are not bounded by scientific rationality" and argue that the "extended facts" that stakeholders contribute to an assessment enhance the quality of the assessment, lead to more effective means for dealing with uncertainty, and "legitimize" the assessment particularly in the eyes of other stakeholders. Furthermore, stakeholder involvement is thought to lead to greater utility of the assessment outcomes (Romsdahl and Pyke 2009), provide a sounder basis for decision making (Moser 2009), and ensure that important components or concerns are not overlooked (Kloprogge and van der Sluijs 2006). Oftentimes stakeholders can provide access to additional or alternative data sources and provide insights on data quality and local conditions (Kloprogge and van der Sluijs 2006;Moser 2009).…”
Section: Stakeholder Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, insights from stakeholders are essential for identifying adaptation options and evaluating feasibility. Stakeholder input is also critical when evaluating the effectiveness of an assessment (Moser 2009;Romsdahl and Pyke 2009).…”
Section: Stakeholder Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This lack of evaluation stems from the nature of the USGCRP as a collection of independent agencies and the complex mix of legal and bureaucratic responsibilities they each hold. But the lack of regular evaluation also limits the assessment of progress toward the USGCRP goals for providing decision support (Romsdahl and Pyke 2009). …”
Section: Defining Decision Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%