What do we know about cryptocurrency investment? An empirical study of its adoption among Indian retail investors

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the cryptocurrency adoption (CA) level among Indian retail investors who use cryptocurrency as an investment and mode of transaction. Design/methodology/approach Through self-administered survey questionnaires, data is collected from 397 retail investors of Haryana (India). This study adopted a quantitative method using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings This paper offered a robust model with a high explanatory value for CA in which four of the five proposed factors of diffusion of innovation theory (trialability, compatibility, complexity and observability) and one of the two proposed factors of consumer behavioral theory (perceived value) significantly influences CA. More specifically, the absence of regulatory support is a barrier to the broad adoption of cryptocurrencies, as its regulations are necessary to mitigate or minimize uncertain outcomes. Research limitations/implications This research primarily focuses on CA in India. Thus, it can be extended to cover diverse other countries for more precise results. Practical implications The results provide insights to the government to design the policies, better regulate and make investment strategies that can ultimately enhance CA. In addition, the study’s results also inform financial educators, policymakers, employers and academicians about the significance of several variables affecting CA in India. Social implications From a social standpoint, this study is an advance that directs central banks and governments to develop, regulate and manage digital currencies and implement a digital currency ecosystem. Moreover, the results assist in understanding investors’ perceptions and decision-making perspectives toward cryptocurrencies through the country’s digitalization. Originality/value This paper fills the study gap to assist policymakers and cryptocurrency experts in broadening their knowledge base and recognizing prioritized intentions. Additionally, this study provides a theoretical model with the latent variable for a present and pertinent matter.

Human-machine dialogues unveiled: an in-depth exploration of individual attitudes and adoption patterns toward AI-powered ChatGPT systems

“…(2019), the value of VIF is less than five and represents no multicollinearity problem in the latent constructs. Thus, the present study reveals that the VIF value is less than the threshold limit and assures the model’s robustness (Kumar and Rani, 2024).…”

Exploring the determinants of solo female travel intention among millennials: a comparative study from rural and urban perspectives

“…Moreover, Hair et al. (2019); Kumar and Rani (2024) reported that discriminant validity between all construct values is below the proposed cut-off of 0.90 and fulfilled the convergent validity criterion (see Table 3).…”

“…Consequently, the value of CA ranged between Study R (0.801-0.854) Study from rural and urban perspectives As noted by Hair et al (2011), all the study R's research constructs ranged (0.565-0.712) and Study U's (0.565-0.719), which infers that the items evaluated in the same constructs characterize beyond 50% of the variance of the constructs. Moreover, Hair et al (2019); Kumar and Rani (2024) reported that discriminant validity between all construct values is below the proposed cut-off of 0.90 and fulfilled the convergent validity criterion (see Table 3).…”