2020
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1846821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do primary school students’ drawings tell us about their mental models on marine environments?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the evidence presented is consistent with the idea that, before translating their thoughts into drawings, young children intentionally selected concepts and perceptions belonging to the botanical domain from their body of knowledge. This assumption is also supported by previous research [ 6 , 16 , 22 , 23 ], and is consistent with the belief that, before the age of 9, children are already engaged in a process of grasping biological phenomena and plant life.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, the evidence presented is consistent with the idea that, before translating their thoughts into drawings, young children intentionally selected concepts and perceptions belonging to the botanical domain from their body of knowledge. This assumption is also supported by previous research [ 6 , 16 , 22 , 23 ], and is consistent with the belief that, before the age of 9, children are already engaged in a process of grasping biological phenomena and plant life.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The branches of earth and space science education articles published in SE , JRST and IJSE during the COVID‐19 pandemic (2020–2021) include: indigenous status positively affected for earth/space learning (Cooper & Berry, 2020); geoscience curricula (Donaldson et al., 2020; King, Gorfinkiel, et al., 2021; Corrochano & Gómez‐Gonçalves, 2020; Remmen & Frøyland, 2020; Atasoy et al., 2020); misconceptions about geology (Guffey & Slater, 2020); social‐institutional of science in the Earth, Sun and Moon unit (Akbayrak & Kaya, 2020); climate change (Young et al., 2020; Sezen‐barrie & Marbach‐ad, 2021; Carman et al., 2021; Nyarko et al., 2021; Zummo, 2020), solar system learning progressions (Plummer et al., 2020); a discussion about time within periodicity in the planetarium dome (Marques et al., 2021); and a multiple case study approach to computer simulation classroom orchestration of heat transfer, Earth, and the sun (Magana et al., 2021). This study shows that the branch of earth/space science contributed the least amount of papers compared to the other branches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data presented indicate that when the frequency with which children draw key elements of plant knowledge, such as flowers, leaves and fruits, is considered, these frequencies cannot be analysed without being broken down by educational level. Previous research has not reported significant differences in relation to gender [ 35 ], but this observation could be a consequence of the fact that during the data analysis, the educational level of the students was not controlled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%