1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00369154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the fundamental concepts of group theory?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some have suggested that an over-reliance on concrete examples of groups leading to a lack of skills in proof production, others, such as Burn (1996), recommend reversing the order of presentation, using examples and applications to stimulate the discovery of definitions and theorems through permutation and symmetry. An example of reducing group theory's high levels of abstraction (Hazzan 2001) is to ask students to construct the operation table for low order groups.…”
Section: Abstract Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some have suggested that an over-reliance on concrete examples of groups leading to a lack of skills in proof production, others, such as Burn (1996), recommend reversing the order of presentation, using examples and applications to stimulate the discovery of definitions and theorems through permutation and symmetry. An example of reducing group theory's high levels of abstraction (Hazzan 2001) is to ask students to construct the operation table for low order groups.…”
Section: Abstract Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers identified the coordination of operation and set as an essential aspect of understanding group and subsequently subgroup. Burn (1996) quickly challenged the use of this question noting that "there is something commendable about suggesting that ℤ 3 is a subgroup of ℤ 6 ..., since every cyclic group of order 6 has a cyclic subgroup of order 3" (p. 373). He was referencing the advanced conception of isomorphism where the set {0,2,4} could be thought of as the same as ℤ 3 and therefore ℤ 3 would in fact be a subgroup of ℤ 6 .…”
Section: Replication Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Dubinsky et al, (1994) reported "On Learning the Fundamental Concepts of Group Theory" where they discussed groups, subgroups, cosets, coset products, and normality, sparking a discussion on this matter. Burn (1996) challenged that isomorphism, closure, associative, identity, inverses, sets, functions, and symmetry were all overlooked as fundamental concepts. Dubinsky, et al (1997) conceded that the title should have stated "on some fundamental concepts of group theory" (p. 251) where functions, sets, permutations, symmetries and the four group axioms are also fundamental to group theory.…”
Section: Fundamental Topics In Group Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They further suggest that the sequencing of such a course should not be linear and discuss a spiral curriculum, learning by successive refinement, microworlds and holistic spray (where students are put into an environment where they are surrounded by group theoretical ideas and the teacher's role is to manage student frustration). Burn (1996) offers a critical analysis of the above paper. The criticism arises not so much from APOS theory nor ISETL, though Burn does suggest that the use of the programming language could be improved if, among other things, the two-dimensional nature of the computer screen could be utilised to include spreadsheets, group tables, and so on.…”
Section: Abstract Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%