2022
DOI: 10.55095/achot2022/022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-Bearing Restrictions after Acetabular Fracture, Necessity or Hope? A Brief Observational Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason why restricted or limited delayed weight-bearing after acetabular fracture fixation is preferred among surgeons is unclear, as most orthopedic surgeons routinely prescribe at least partial weight-bearing for a lower extremity fracture in an attempt to produce an optimal mechanical environment at various stages of fracture healing [ 41 ]. From a biomechanical point of view, weight-bearing produces micromovements between the fracture fragments, stimulating bone consolidation, which clinically implies rapid functional recovery and a faster return to activities of daily living, thus potentially reducing complications associated with late rehabilitation protocols [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The reason why restricted or limited delayed weight-bearing after acetabular fracture fixation is preferred among surgeons is unclear, as most orthopedic surgeons routinely prescribe at least partial weight-bearing for a lower extremity fracture in an attempt to produce an optimal mechanical environment at various stages of fracture healing [ 41 ]. From a biomechanical point of view, weight-bearing produces micromovements between the fracture fragments, stimulating bone consolidation, which clinically implies rapid functional recovery and a faster return to activities of daily living, thus potentially reducing complications associated with late rehabilitation protocols [ 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature on weight-bearing status after fixation of an acetabulum fractures continues to empirically suggest at least 6 weeks of non-weight-bearing as the most prevalent postoperative treatment option, mainly due to fear of implant failure, fracture displacement, and loss of reduction. This more conservative recommendation appears to be motivated by the belief that by reducing the forces acting at the fracture site, the bone and ligament healing processes will occur without greater risk of fixation failure [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. In fact, in the 22 studies included [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], we consistently observed that active and passive hip movements and isometric quadriceps- and abductor-strengthening exercises were started between one and three days postoperatively, and weight bearing was basically postponed depending on the patient’s general condition and fracture healing state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations