Our study results show that, despite physical therapy training, weight-bearing compliance to recommended limits was low. Adherence to the partial weight-bearing task was further decreased over time. Uncontrolled weight-bearing recommendations should thus be viewed with caution and carefully considered as fiction. The presented insole is feasible to determine weight bearing continuously, could immediately help define real-time patient behaviour and establish realistic, individual weight-bearing recommendations.
Although the field of geriatric trauma is – ironically – young, care for the elderly trauma patient is increasingly recognised as an important challenge, considering the worldwide trend towards increasing longevity.Increasing age is associated with physiological changes and resulting comorbidities that present multiple challenges to the treating physician.Even though polytrauma is less likely with increasing age, lower-energy trauma can also result in life-threatening injuries due to the reduced physiological reserve.Mechanisms of injury and resulting injury patterns are markedly changed in the elderly population and new management strategies are needed. From initial triage to long-term rehabilitation, these patients require care that differs from the everyday standard.In the current review, the special requirements of this increasing patient population are reviewed and management options discussed. With the increase in orthogeriatrics as a speciality, the current status quo will almost certainly shift towards a more tailored treatment approach for the elderly patient. Further research expanding our current knowledge is needed to reduce the high morbidity and mortality rate.Cite this article: Braun BJ, Holstein J, Fritz T, Veith NT, Herath S, Mörsdorf P, Pohlemann T. Polytrauma in the elderly: a review. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:146-151. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160002.
Objective:
In his original series of 129 surgically treated acetabular fractures, Letournel did not operate on patients older than 60 years. Almost 30 years later, he still emphasized that no patients with reduced bone quality should be operated on. The aim of the study was to analyze epidemiologic characteristics and treatment modes for today's cohort of elderly patients with acetabular fractures.
Design:
Retrospective analysis.
Setting:
Multicenter registry/Level I trauma center.
Patients:
Three thousand seven hundred ninety-three patients who had sustained a fracture of the acetabulum.
Intervention:
Operative and nonoperative treatment of acetabular fractures.
Main Outcome Measurements:
Epidemiologic characteristics, treatment mode, in-hospital mortality, rate of secondary hip arthroplasty, and quality of life indicated by EQ-5D score.
Results:
For the multicenter registry, more than 50% of all patients with acetabular fractures had an age of 60 years or over. The age peak was found at 75–80 years. Fifty percent of the elderly patients were treated surgically. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in elderly patients than patients younger than 60 years. In our Level I trauma center, surgical treatment by open reduction and internal fixation did not influence in-hospital mortality or quality of life of elderly patients with acetabular fractures.
Conclusions:
Today, elderly persons represent the dominant cohort among patients with fractures of the acetabulum. Fifty-five years after the publication of Letournel's original case series, data indicate that currently, surgical treatment is a common and necessary option in the therapy of acetabular fractures in elderly patients.
Level of Evidence:
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.