2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web interface for reflectivity fitting

Abstract: The Liquids Reflectometer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Spallation Neutron Source provides neutron reflectivity capability for an average of about 30 experiments each year. In recent years, there has been a large effort to streamline the data processing and analysis for the instrument. While much of the data reduction can be automated, data analysis remains something that needs to be done by scientists. For this purpose, we present a reflectivity fitting web interface that captures the process of setting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This two-layer model was supported by the previous QCM analysis, which demonstrated the film–water interface to have the most significant response, while higher n harmonics revealed a more gradual response. The thickness, scattering length density (SLD), and roughness of the layers were systematically varied and optimized until the sum of the χ 2 -values for all the data points were minimized (Supplementary Table S2 for fitting results) 55 . The thickness of the films were determined by h = 2 π /Δ Q , where Δ Q is the wave vector difference between fringes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This two-layer model was supported by the previous QCM analysis, which demonstrated the film–water interface to have the most significant response, while higher n harmonics revealed a more gradual response. The thickness, scattering length density (SLD), and roughness of the layers were systematically varied and optimized until the sum of the χ 2 -values for all the data points were minimized (Supplementary Table S2 for fitting results) 55 . The thickness of the films were determined by h = 2 π /Δ Q , where Δ Q is the wave vector difference between fringes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each sample was exposed to the room-temperature water surface for 1 h during the alignment procedure and subsequently scanned with a Q -vector range from 0.008 to 0.060 Å −1 . Data reduction and fitting were performed through the online reflectivity modeling software provided by BL-4B 55 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The footprint on the sample is kept constant through adjustments in the sample slit opening commensurate with the angle of incidence. Analysis was done using the Motofit analysis package and ORNL’s web interface (Webi). , Measurements result in a reflectivity ( R ) as a function of Q , which can be modeled to produce an SLD profile as a function of sample depth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis was done using the Motofit analysis package and ORNL's web interface (Webi). 33,34 Measurements result in a reflectivity (R) as a function of Q, which can be modeled to produce an SLD profile as a function of sample depth.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The black curves in Fig.6(c) show the best fit of reconstructed XRR curves. XRR curves were fitted using the REFL1D program(Doucet et al, 2018). A simple slab model with one layer was used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%