2017
DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

We Want Them All Covered! Collective Bargaining and Firm Heterogeneity: Theory and Evidence from Germany

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the model byBaumann and Brändle (2017) deviates slightly in this respect. While they do share the prediction that the least productive firms opt for fully decentralized wage bargaining, they also predict that the most productive firms will be subject to firm-level collective bargaining.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only the model byBaumann and Brändle (2017) deviates slightly in this respect. While they do share the prediction that the least productive firms opt for fully decentralized wage bargaining, they also predict that the most productive firms will be subject to firm-level collective bargaining.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In another paper, Baumann and Brändle (2017) establish a link between the extent of collective bargaining coverage and the degree of productivity dispersion within an industry.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Working Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%