“We're not friends anymore! unless…”: the frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression

Abstract

The frequency of items of indirect, relational, social, verbal, and physical aggression was assessed in the school environment of 422 adolescents, using the Indirect/Social/Relational Aggression scale (ISRA), a measure that combined items from indirect, relational, and social aggression research. We also assessed the perceived harmfulness of each item. Comparing these findings with the occurrence of aggression on television, we found that adolescents were exposed to nearly 10 times more indirect, relational, and social aggression on television than they are in school. Overall, there was no sex difference in the amount of aggression reported by boys and girls. However, when examining specific items, girls reported more gossiping and boys more hitting. Girls perceived indirect, direct relational, and verbal aggression as more harmful than did boys. Limited evidence was found for a distinction between indirect, relational, and social aggression, although it was clear that they were more similar than different. Aggr. Behav. 32:294-307, 2006. r

Investigating Bullying Determinants and Typologies with Social Network Analysis

“…Bullies presented a higher level of externalization, while victims more internalizing symptoms [21]. In fact, bullies usually motivate others against the target, and the identities of the perpetrators are often known to them [22]. Boys are more intimidated than girls while the family income appears to be negatively related to bullying [23].…”

The Influence of Aggression-Evoking Cues on Aggressive Cognitions in Males and Females: Different Procedures – Similar Effects

“…The magnitude of the sex differences in aggression decreases significantly when aggression results in a less visible actor's suffering (Eagly and Steffen 1986), which is characteristic for relational and verbal aggression. Further, adolescent girls evaluate aggression as being more harmful than boys (Coyne et al 2006), whereas women perceive the same act of direct aggression as being more aggressive than men (Frodi et al 1977). From this point of view, the effect of aggression priming should not appear for physically aggressive cognitions, but rather for the relational and verbal subscales of the WCT.…”

Legitimacy and Use of Verbal Aggression Among Youth Basketball Players

“…Scholars in Europe and the U.S. found a general culture of verbal aggression and namecalling prevalent at the middle and high school levels; boys used sexual insults against girls, girls used gendered and sexual terms against each other, and social class and racebased bullying were common (Coyne, Archer & Eslea, 2006;Salmivalli & Kaukiainen, 2004;Stein, 1999;Veenstra et al 2005;Wessler & De Andrade, 2006). Coyne et al (2006) determined that name-calling was the most frequent type of verbal aggression, while physical bullying was the least common type of aggression among middle and high school students in the United Kingdom.…”

“…Coyne et al (2006) determined that name-calling was the most frequent type of verbal aggression, while physical bullying was the least common type of aggression among middle and high school students in the United Kingdom. In Wessler and De Andrade's (2006) study, high school students in the U.S. reported hearing jokes and slurs about topics ranging from body parts and athletic ability to religion and sexual orientation multiple times each day.…”

“…Recently, work by Coyne et al (2006) experiencing at home and compared it with a content analysis of popular television shows. Overall, girls and boys in sixth through eighth grade experienced similar levels of aggression.…”