2017
DOI: 10.4236/jcc.2017.57002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating Bullying Determinants and Typologies with Social Network Analysis

Abstract: Aim of this paper is to detect determinants and to suggest a typology bullying. Four network samples of 218 students in total (male = 92, female = 126) at the Physical Education and Sport Sciences Dept. and the Veterinary Dept. of the University of Thessaly have been collected in 2017. Standardized questionnaire composed of network and non-network part was answered. Social network analysis and cross-sectional statistics (Spearman test and Principal Component Analysis) were implemented. Basic results: Female ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The network-related part of the questionnaire was based on previous tested questionnaires [57] [65] [66]. Questions relevant to verbal aggressiveness and bullying were converted from psychometric into network form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network-related part of the questionnaire was based on previous tested questionnaires [57] [65] [66]. Questions relevant to verbal aggressiveness and bullying were converted from psychometric into network form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that the instructors' communication with their trainees has a noticeable effect on the learning process as well as a significant interaction with possible aggressiveness (Bekiari, 2012;2017b;Bekiari, Deliligka, & Hasanagas, 2017;Bekiari, Deliligka, & Koustelios, 2016;Bekiari, Digelidis, & Sakellariou, 2006;2016a,b,c;Bekiari, Hasanagas, Theoharis, Kefalas, & Vasilou, 2015;Bekiari, Kokaridas, & Sakellariou, 2005;2006;Bekiari, Patsiaouras, Kokaridas, & Sakellariou, 2006;Bekiari, Koustelios, & Sakellariou, 2000;Bekiari, Nikolaidou, & Hasanagas, 2017;Bekiari, Pachi, & Hasanagas, 2017;Bekiari & Sakellariou, 2003;Bekiari & Spanou, 2018;Hasanagas, Bekiari, & Vasilos, 2017;Manoli & Bekiari, 2015;Myers & Claus, 2012;Theoharis, Bekiari, & Koustelios, 2017). Argumentativeness is considered to be a cognitive skill which is necessary for a thinking person and thus for our contemporary culture (Kuhn & Crowell, 2011;Osborne, 2010) impacting positively in human communication (Goodboy & Myers, 2012).…”
Section: Argumentativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A verbal aggressor either attack to the victim's personality with a different pattern or simple try to exclude him from social surrounding. Such typologies have also been proposed in previous research[41] [61].…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%