2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave induced instantaneously-liquefied soil depth in a non-cohesive seabed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative hybrid foundation system comprising a monopile and a bearing plate (or skirted footing) has been demonstrated to enhance the lateral bearing capacity compared with a monopile [96][97][98][99]. Nevertheless, the enhanced capacity of the hybrid foundation largely relies on the proper interaction between the bearing plate and the soils at the shallow zone of the seabed, where local scour and wave-induced pore pressure could occur [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108]. The extent of local scour and scour effects on both the bearing capacity and natural frequency of a hybrid monopile need to be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative hybrid foundation system comprising a monopile and a bearing plate (or skirted footing) has been demonstrated to enhance the lateral bearing capacity compared with a monopile [96][97][98][99]. Nevertheless, the enhanced capacity of the hybrid foundation largely relies on the proper interaction between the bearing plate and the soils at the shallow zone of the seabed, where local scour and wave-induced pore pressure could occur [100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108]. The extent of local scour and scour effects on both the bearing capacity and natural frequency of a hybrid monopile need to be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This (u/σ' v0 >1) occurs because of the use of the elastic model, and cannot be rigorously avoided as there is no yielding criteria. In fact, the maximum liquefaction depth predicted with elastic model may be larger than that with a plastic model, due to the fact that the pore pressure is difficult to release with the elastic model (Qi and Gao, 2018). Such conservative approach benefits the foundation design in engineering practice.…”
Section: Residual Liquefactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P osc is the oscillatory pore-pressure corresponding to the elastic deformation of the soil skeleton. P osc fluctuates in both temporal and spatial domains, and the fluctuation is accompanied by the attenuation of the amplitude and phase lag under wave actions [13][14][15]. P res is the residual pore-pressure that is period-averaged, and is the result of accumulated plastic deformation of the soil skeleton.…”
Section: Analytical Solution For Wave-induced Pore-pressure Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%