2019
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2018.0254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Treatment Residuals in Bioretention Planters to Reduce Phosphorus Levels in Stormwater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes to the soil mix may help reduce PO 4 3− and TP soil water concentrations. These may include reducing or replacing the compost with another carbon source such as shredded bark or wood fiber mulch as has been done in many municipalities [37][38][39], or adding amendments to sequester phosphorus such as WTRs, iron filings, or fly ash [26,34,40]. This is particularly important for systems that have an underdrain discharging to sensitive receiving waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes to the soil mix may help reduce PO 4 3− and TP soil water concentrations. These may include reducing or replacing the compost with another carbon source such as shredded bark or wood fiber mulch as has been done in many municipalities [37][38][39], or adding amendments to sequester phosphorus such as WTRs, iron filings, or fly ash [26,34,40]. This is particularly important for systems that have an underdrain discharging to sensitive receiving waters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphate concentrations at GSI sites were much higher than stormwater concentrations from the NSQD (on the order of 25-65x higher), indicating there is an export of PO 4 3− from these systems. High phosphorus concentrations from GSI systems have been observed in many other studies in the northwest as a result of leaching of phosphorus from the compost in the soil mix [8,[18][19][20]34,35]. Due to the relatively high PO 4 3− concentrations in all of the GSI systems, it is likely that the GSI systems on the University of Portland campus are exporting PO 4 3− due to the compost in the soil mix.…”
Section: Phosphatementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Results indicate that these high levels of phosphate removal are possible for up to 20 years or more. Poor et al (2019) found that WTRs were more effective when included in a bioretention system as a layer placed below a compost layer and above a sand layer as compared to when all bioretention media components are thoroughly mixed. Typically, however, the WTRs are mixed with the media.…”
Section: Water Treatment Residualsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The manner in which P-sorbing materials are incorporated into bioretention media may significantly impact both system hydraulics and P removal. Studies investigating P-sorbing materials in bioretention have applied them as solid layers within the media profile , and mixed them with the other media constituents. , Solid layers of P-sorbing materials may restrict water flow because their hydraulic conductivity tends to be lower than that of sand. , Mixed layers of P-sorbing materials may mitigate their hydraulic impacts but reduce their P removal efficiency . Mechanistic knowledge of how amendment layering strategies influence trade-offs between hydraulic conductivity and P removal is essential for the design of bioretention media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%