1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31162-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voicing cues in English final stops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…F 1 frequencies evolved towards relatively lower F 1 before voiced codas as they progressed from the onset /l/ through to the midpoint of the vowel, while F 2 frequencies evolved towards increasingly higher frequencies towards V-mid. This pattern supports the findings of Wolf (1978) and Summers (1988), particularly those of Wolf, and extends them to include the syllable onset as well. Some particular vowel qualities will produce different patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…F 1 frequencies evolved towards relatively lower F 1 before voiced codas as they progressed from the onset /l/ through to the midpoint of the vowel, while F 2 frequencies evolved towards increasingly higher frequencies towards V-mid. This pattern supports the findings of Wolf (1978) and Summers (1988), particularly those of Wolf, and extends them to include the syllable onset as well. Some particular vowel qualities will produce different patterns.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These coda-dependent differences, which may be reflected in the spectral patterns observed at vowel onset (V-on in Figures 1 and 2), mirror the pattern at the other end of the syllable: Chen (1970) and Fujimura & Miller (1979) have shown that F 1 transitions at a VC boundary are slower when the C is voiced, at least for low vowels. These small and relatively simple patterns in the acoustics may mask quite complex production effects: a number of experiments have shown that onset hawkins-nguyen_phon00-21 transitions in vowels preceding voiced vs. voiceless stops show complex effects in which tongue, jaw, and probably lip movements seem to be quasi-independent so that their combined effects produce rather small acoustic differences overall (Wolf, 1978;Fitch, 1981;Summers, 1987;Löfquist & Gracco, 1994).…”
Section: Spectral Shape: Formant Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these variations serve as cues for phonological contrasts. For example, Wolf57 and Summers58 found that low vowels (/æ/ in Wolf, / / in Summers) show higher peak F 1 values before voiceless consonants than before voiced ones, the opposite of what would be expected from undershoot, given that vowels typically exhibit shorter durations before voiceless consonants. Moreover, higher F 1 values at the vowel offset59 and the onset and steady‐state60 have been found to result in identification of the following consonant as voiceless in perception experiments.…”
Section: Illustrations Of What Language Users ‘Know’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More commonly, researchers have suggested that vowel duration is one acoustic cue among a number of different cues that contribute to the voicing distinction of the following consonant (Hillenbrand, Ingrisano, Smith & Flege, 1984;Hogan & Rozsypal, 1980;Wolf, 1978). However, Luce and Luce (1978) suggest that vowel duration cues may be the most consistently and reliably produced of the various cues that have been found to play significant roles in the perception of voicing of a postvocalic consonant.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%