Sociolinguistic variables and cognition

Abstract

Sociolinguistics has examined mental organization of language only sporadically. Meanwhile, areas of linguistics that deal with cognitive organization seldom delve deeply into language variation. Variation is essential for understanding how language is structured cognitively, however. Three kinds of evidence are discussed to illustrate this point. First, style shifting demonstrates that language users develop detailed associations of when to produce specific linguistic forms, depending on the pragmatic context. Second, variation in fine-grained phonetic cues shows that cognitive organization applies to linguistic forms not otherwise known to be under speakers' control. Finally, experiments on dialect comprehension and identification demonstrate that listeners have detailed cognitive associations of language variants with groups of people, whether or not they can produce the same variants themselves. A model is presented for how sociolinguistic knowledge can be viewed in relation to other parts of language with regard to cognitive and neural representations. WIREs Cogni Sci 2011 2 701-716 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.152 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Variation isn’t that hard: Morphosyntactic choice does not predict production difficulty

“…Likewise, the self-monitoring process must monitor (and potentially substitute/repair) units at every level of grammar (following [ 47 ], though see [ 49 , 50 , 52 ]). This perhaps aligns better with a cognitive network model of language production as described by Thomas [ 182 ] and others in which sociolinguistic knowledge is integrated with every structural element of the grammar. In this way, the potential for variation is ubiquitous—and if any production difficulty is caused by selecting variants, that difficulty has the potential to arise both where grammatical variation exists and where it does not.…”

Prolegomena to a cognitive science of language diversity

“…In turn, this effect can be related to memory issues, as some social indexes are stored in the long-term memory (like the phonetic cues characterizing specific sociolects or speech styles), whereas others are stored in the short-term memory (like some of the phonetic cues involved in the negotiation of conversational turns, as the pitch updrift at the end of an utterance when we wish to hold the floor) (see Foulkes, 2010 for details). Additionally, our social expectations can bias our memory resources, since social prominence usually results in more efficient storage, improved processing, and increased intelligibility (Foulkes, 2010;Thomas, 2011;Levon & Fox, 2014). Since most if not all language features index some type of social information (see Foulkes & Docherty, 2006, for deeper discussion), this type of effects can be safely expected to impact more or less noticeably on our cognition, and are thus of interest for a neuroscience of language.…”

Avant-Garde Poetry in Postmodernism Literature

“…The idea of pluralistic and world music holds that all musical cultures are equal and have unique values. [2] Therefore, classical, modern and postmodern professional music, folk music of various nationalities in the world, and all kinds of popular music are all aesthetic resources, living and thriving together to form a multi-cultural ecology, which means several culture live in a huge environment.…”