1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9924(97)00053-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice onset time in spanish-english bilinguals: early versus late learners of english

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the speakers in this study could perceptually separate categories for the stops, their English production of voiceless stop categories was deemed not to be fully independent of their native Spanish production of voiceless stops. Thornburgh and Ryalls (1998) lend further support to the hypothesis that age of L2 acquisition affects durational cues in L2 production in their findings that mean differences between VOT stops in English and Spanish were greater in early bilinguals than in late bilinguals. González-López (2012) found that late English-Spanish bilinguals differentiated their VOTs between English and Spanish stops, from which she affirms that the mechanisms necessary for phonetic category development remain intact over the lifetime.…”
Section: Age-related Phonetic Patterns In Bilingualssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…While the speakers in this study could perceptually separate categories for the stops, their English production of voiceless stop categories was deemed not to be fully independent of their native Spanish production of voiceless stops. Thornburgh and Ryalls (1998) lend further support to the hypothesis that age of L2 acquisition affects durational cues in L2 production in their findings that mean differences between VOT stops in English and Spanish were greater in early bilinguals than in late bilinguals. González-López (2012) found that late English-Spanish bilinguals differentiated their VOTs between English and Spanish stops, from which she affirms that the mechanisms necessary for phonetic category development remain intact over the lifetime.…”
Section: Age-related Phonetic Patterns In Bilingualssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Speaker intrinsic factors are also relevant to predicting interaction between a bilingual’s two languages. Specifically, the nature and extent of interaction depends on the age of the speaker, the age at which each language was acquired, the amount of input and output in both languages, and the level of proficiency and dominance in the two languages (e.g., Flege, 1991, 2002; Flege et al, 1995, 1997, 1999, 2002; Thornburgh and Ryalls, 1998; Guion, 2003; Fowler et al, 2008; Simonet, 2010; Antoniou et al, 2011; Lee and Iverson, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+20 msec; Thornburgh & Ryalls, 1998;Zampini, 1998). The Spanish voiced stop consonants /b, d, g/ are typically prevoiced (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Comparing performance by language, participants recognized English CCV− voiceless stimuli more quickly than the Spanish CCV− voiceless (English 58.48% recognition point vs. Spanish 78.76% recognition point). The voice onset time (VOT) for initial voiceless stop consonants is longer in English than Spanish (Thornburgh & Ryalls, 1998;Zampini, 1998). That participants identified the English CCV− voiceless stimuli more quickly may perhaps be attributed to the longer VOT in English than Spanish (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%