2010 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icsps.2010.5555444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VLSI implementation of camera digital signal processor for document projection system

Abstract: The camera digital signal processing (DSP) core is a key component for a video catching system. In this study, first high-performance and low-complexity algorithms are developed for the camera DSP system. The main functions involve the color interpolation, white balance, color space transformation, auto gain control, edge enhancement and color enhancement. Simulations demonstrate that the proposed method can achieve good quality as for a color-filter-array format camera. Based on the algorithms, the DSP proces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of the SSIM index is from human visual system and it can be calculated as Table I lists the comparison of the four formula values and computing time for the previous designs with this work. The average CPSNR value in this work is 34.584 dB, which is better than 30.71 dB, 32.21 dB, 32.8 dB, and 34.377 dB in previous design [8], [9], [10], and [12], respectively. Compared with the previous designs [8][9][10]12], this work improved the average values of PSNR, CPSNR, and S-CIELAB △E* metric by over 0.06 dB, 0.207 dB, and 0.053, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Chip Implementationmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The concept of the SSIM index is from human visual system and it can be calculated as Table I lists the comparison of the four formula values and computing time for the previous designs with this work. The average CPSNR value in this work is 34.584 dB, which is better than 30.71 dB, 32.21 dB, 32.8 dB, and 34.377 dB in previous design [8], [9], [10], and [12], respectively. Compared with the previous designs [8][9][10]12], this work improved the average values of PSNR, CPSNR, and S-CIELAB △E* metric by over 0.06 dB, 0.207 dB, and 0.053, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Chip Implementationmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The average CPSNR value in this work is 34.584 dB, which is better than 30.71 dB, 32.21 dB, 32.8 dB, and 34.377 dB in previous design [8], [9], [10], and [12], respectively. Compared with the previous designs [8][9][10]12], this work improved the average values of PSNR, CPSNR, and S-CIELAB △E* metric by over 0.06 dB, 0.207 dB, and 0.053, respectively. In addition, an experimental result of computing time is added for comparing time complexity, which is the average time to demosaick per image of Kodak database by a computer with Intel core i7-2630QM when operated at 2.6 GHz.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Chip Implementationmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations