2015
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.000258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitellibacter echinoideorum sp. nov., isolated from a sea urchin (Tripneustes gratilla)

Abstract: A Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped, yellow-pigment-producing bacterium (designated strain CC-CZW007 T ) was isolated from seafood samples (sea urchins) at Penghu Island in Taiwan. Strain CC-CZW007 T grew optimally at pH 7.0 and 30 8C in the presence of 3 % (w/v) NaCl. The novel strain shared highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to Vitellibacter vladivostokensis JCM 11732 T (96.8 %), Vitellibacter soesokkakensis KCTC 32536 T (96.4 %), Vitellibacter nionensis KCTC 32420 T (95.8 %) and Vitellibacter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the genus Vitellibacter was introduced (Nedashkovskaya et al, 2003), type strains from the previously suggested genus Aequorivita (Bowman and Nichols, 2002) were not considered. The phenotypic features reported in the literature (Bowman and Nichols, 2002; Nedashkovskaya et al, 2003; Bowman, 2006; Park et al, 2009, 2014; Kim et al, 2010; Liu et al, 2013; Lin S. Y. et al, 2015; Rajasabapathy et al, 2015) for the species of two genera considerably overlap. The only stable difference is whether the cells are oxidase-positive or negative, but this alone can hardly justify two separate genera.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the genus Vitellibacter was introduced (Nedashkovskaya et al, 2003), type strains from the previously suggested genus Aequorivita (Bowman and Nichols, 2002) were not considered. The phenotypic features reported in the literature (Bowman and Nichols, 2002; Nedashkovskaya et al, 2003; Bowman, 2006; Park et al, 2009, 2014; Kim et al, 2010; Liu et al, 2013; Lin S. Y. et al, 2015; Rajasabapathy et al, 2015) for the species of two genera considerably overlap. The only stable difference is whether the cells are oxidase-positive or negative, but this alone can hardly justify two separate genera.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description is the same as for Vitellibacter echinoideorum (Lin S. Y. et al, 2015). The type strain is CC-CZW007 = BCRC 80886 = JCM 30378.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 40.6 mol%. T (the values of total fatty acids for strains 1-5 were obtained from the present study under similar growth conditions); and 6, V. echinoideorum CC-CZW007 T (data obtained from Lin et al, 2015). TR, Trace (less than 1 %); -, not detected.…”
Section: Muricauda Flavescens Sw-62 T (Ay445073)supporting
confidence: 56%
“…vladivostokensis (Nedashkovskaya et al, 2003), Vitellibacter aestuarii (Kim et al, 2010), Vitellibacter soesokkakensis , Vitellibacter nionensis (Rajasabapathy et al, 2015) and Vitellibacter echinoideorum (Lin et al, 2015) (LPSN, http://www.bacterio.net/index.html). Members of this genus are typically Gram-staining-negative, rodshaped, aerobic bacteria that have been isolated from marine environments, except for strain V. soesokkakensis RSSK-12 T which was isolated from the junction between the ocean and a freshwater spring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, bacteria in the genus of Vitellibacter were recently moved to the genus Aequorivita in 2016 [4]. The proposed names of type species Vitellibacter vladivostokensis KMN 3516 T [5], Vitellibacter aestuarii JC2436 T [6], Vitellibacter soesokkakensis RSSK-12 T [7], Vitellibacter nionensis VBW088 T [8] and Vitellibacter echinoideorum CC-CZW007 T [9], were amended as Aequorivita vladivostokensis KMN 3516 T , Aequorivita aestuarii JC2436 T , Aequorivita soesokkakensis RSSK-12 T , Aequorivita nionensis VBW088 T and Aequorivita echinoideorum CC-CZW007 T , respectively [4]. Two recently identified species in the genus of Vitellibacter, Vitellibacter aquimaris [10] and Vitellibacter todarodis [11], were not classified into the genus Aequorivita, even though they phylogenetically grouped with those type strains being moved to the genus Aequorivita from the genus Vitellibacter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%