“…In accordance with the recommended NOS and AHRQ criteria, only studies of acceptable quality were included in the present meta-analysis; eight studies received 9 stars [51,53,[56][57][58]62,63,66], ten studies received 8 stars [43,[48][49][50]52,54,55,[59][60][61], ve studies received 7 stars [42,[44][45][46][47] and one study received 6 stars [41]. When using the quality assessment criteria from the AHRQ, three studies received a score of 11 [24,29,65], ten received a score of 10 [22,25,28,29,31,33,34,36,39,40], three received a score of 9 [23,32,35], one received a score of 8 [27], one received a score of 7 [37] and two received a score of 5 [26,38], the quality assessment are shown in Appendix S2. Therefore, no article from the meta-analysis was excluded for quality reasons.…”