2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610218000996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual analogue mood scale scores in healthy young versus older adults

Abstract: These findings establish current mood state differences in young versus older adults. The absence of age-group differences in past studies may relate to the limited precision of the scales (only 7 points, in contrast to the 100-point scales used here).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(78 reference statements)
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The age by emotion interaction for false alarms was limited to emotional non-targets; there was no interaction here between age and emotion in blocks with neutral non-targets (Schel and Crone, 2013). Notably, the 3-way interaction among emotion, stimulus type, and age reached a more stringent level of significance (results reported in Supplementary Materials) after consideration of the influence of age differences in anxiety (Machado et al, 2018), which can increase attention and false alarm rates to negative information in particular (Mogg and Bradley, 2005; Pacheco-Unguetti et al, 2012). This exploratory finding confirms that the interactive effects of age were not attributable merely to differing degrees of reported anxiety between younger and older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The age by emotion interaction for false alarms was limited to emotional non-targets; there was no interaction here between age and emotion in blocks with neutral non-targets (Schel and Crone, 2013). Notably, the 3-way interaction among emotion, stimulus type, and age reached a more stringent level of significance (results reported in Supplementary Materials) after consideration of the influence of age differences in anxiety (Machado et al, 2018), which can increase attention and false alarm rates to negative information in particular (Mogg and Bradley, 2005; Pacheco-Unguetti et al, 2012). This exploratory finding confirms that the interactive effects of age were not attributable merely to differing degrees of reported anxiety between younger and older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Measures of cognition included the Trail Making Task parts A and B (Reitan, 1958), and Color-Word Interference (4 conditions) and Verbal Fluency Tasks (4 conditions) from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Functioning System (D-KEFS; Delis et al, 2001). In light of documented age differences in mood and anxiety (Machado et al, 2018) and in use of emotion regulation strategies (Urry and Gross, 2010), participants also completed self-report measures including the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ; Gross and John, 2003), Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Spielberger and Gorsuch, 1983), and a depression inventory [older adults: Geriatric Depression Scale 30-item version (GDS; Yesavage et al, 1983); younger adults: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck et al, 1961)] to explore the possibility of differing relationships between these measures and emotional response inhibition as a function of aging. Following from our and others’ prior findings in younger adult samples (Mogg and Bradley, 2005; Pacheco-Unguetti et al, 2012; Greif and Waring, 2018), we explored whether higher anxiety or depression corresponded with poorer task performance (slower responses, more false alarms).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAS referred to a 10-cm visual scale representing a continuum with the ends marked ‘0 (no pain)’ and ‘10 (unbearable pain)’. 20 Patients were asked to mark the scale from 0 to 10 when they experienced the worst pain intensity. Physiological measurements, including heart rates and blood oxygen saturation (SaO 2 ), were considered as the secondary outcome measures, which were monitored using a pulse oximeter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six internal mood states (sad, energetic, tense, happy, tired, and calm; in that order) were assessed using VAMS (Machado et al, 2018). For each mood scale, the following instruction was displayed: “Click the position of the line that best represents how you feel right now.” A black 100 mm horizontal line representing (but not displaying) distinct positions from 0 to 100 was presented below the instructions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%