2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual abnormal behavior detection based on trajectory sparse reconstruction analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the abnormal event is identified by measuring the deviation or probability of the testing trajectory with respect to the normal event models. Li et al [9] learned a dictionary using normal trajectories and then detected abnormal events according to the reconstruction error of their trajectory under the learned dictionary. Aköz et al [10] proposed a traffic event classification system that learned normal and common traffic flows by clustering vehicle trajectories.…”
Section: ) Trajectory-wise Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the abnormal event is identified by measuring the deviation or probability of the testing trajectory with respect to the normal event models. Li et al [9] learned a dictionary using normal trajectories and then detected abnormal events according to the reconstruction error of their trajectory under the learned dictionary. Aköz et al [10] proposed a traffic event classification system that learned normal and common traffic flows by clustering vehicle trajectories.…”
Section: ) Trajectory-wise Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works are able to detect anomalies locally in videos and without an explicit definition of what the abnormality is. Among these, two main classes are found: trajectory-based (Stauffer and Grimson, 2000;Piciarelli et al, 2008;Wu et al, 2010;Jiang et al, 2011;Zen et al, 2012;Li et al, 2013) and feature-based ones (Adam et al, 2008;Kim and Grauman, 2009;Kratz and Nishino, 2009;Antic and Ommer, 2011;Bertini et al, 2012;Cong et al, 2013;Hu et al, 2013;Li et al, 2014;Cheng et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse representations have been increasingly adopted for anomaly detection, as the problem can be elegantly modeled with sparse linear combinations of representations in a training dataset (Zhao et al, 2011;Cong et al, 2013;Li et al, 2013;Zhu et al, 2014). Explicit image space subdivision can also benefit anomaly localization performance in sparse representation-based methods (Biswas and Babu, 2014).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many pioneering algorithms [1,16,4,14,15] have been developed during this period. According to Ce Li et al [12], all of them can be coarsely classified into two categories, namely trajectory analysis and features based analysis such as optical flow, etc. In trajectory analysis [12,16,21,18], usual behavior is learned through tracking of normal objects/persons and their interaction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ce Li et al [12], all of them can be coarsely classified into two categories, namely trajectory analysis and features based analysis such as optical flow, etc. In trajectory analysis [12,16,21,18], usual behavior is learned through tracking of normal objects/persons and their interaction. On the other side, video feature based analysis [4,15,2,3] involves abnormality detection based on the feature of a space-time cube.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%