2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2012.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtually dopant-free CMOS: Midgap Schottky-barrier nanowire field-effect-transistors for high temperature applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8). The performance of the 1 st generation planar DeFET devices is in the same order of magnitude as the previously fabricated Si-NW FET 10 clearly demonstrating the potential of the planar high temperature Figure 11. Comparison of the temperature dependent S/D leakage current suppression of reported SOI MOSFET, 24 JLFET, 4 FinFET 25 and experimental as well as simulated dehancement mode FET.…”
Section: Bg / Fg Biasingsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8). The performance of the 1 st generation planar DeFET devices is in the same order of magnitude as the previously fabricated Si-NW FET 10 clearly demonstrating the potential of the planar high temperature Figure 11. Comparison of the temperature dependent S/D leakage current suppression of reported SOI MOSFET, 24 JLFET, 4 FinFET 25 and experimental as well as simulated dehancement mode FET.…”
Section: Bg / Fg Biasingsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This combination improves the high temperature robustness as reported recently for our SiNW FETs. 9,10 For the first time, we have successfully extended this 3D-SiNW concept to planar, non-nanowire device structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. It is partly based on our published SiNW FET technology [3], [4], [5]. The new concept, as well as the previous the SiNW technology, is experimentally based on a virtually undoped SOI substrate, i.e.…”
Section: Device Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Schottky barrier parameters for the simulation of the S/D contacts have been estimated by comparing and fitting simulated and measured back-gate voltage sweeps of the fabricated SiNW FET devices with 70 nm x 70 nm rectangular diameter and 50um length ( Fig. 5) [3], [4], [5]. Remaining deviations between measurement and simulation are mainly caused by differences in device and contact geometries as well as not modeled complex Schottky barrier effects (not shown here) as, for example, barrier lowering due to image charges.…”
Section: A Back-gate Enhancement Mode Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. This terminal offers a new degree of freedom in the device: the polarity of conduction can be controlled which was utilized in [64][65][66]88] to demonstrate a reconfigurable FET operation. In these reconfigurable (or polarity controlled) devices, one gate electrode (control gate) controls the conduction through the channel while the other gate electrode (polarity gate) controls the polarity of conduction (see…”
Section: Reconfigurable Sb-mosfetsmentioning
confidence: 99%