2000
DOI: 10.1080/08832320009599039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewpoint: Doing Things the Hard Way—Problems with Mission-Linked AACSB Accreditation Standards and Suggestions for Improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They cited many negative effects: accreditation has influenced business school staffing, research, and curriculum policies (Gore, Steven, & Bailey, 1998;Henninger, 1994) and caused schools to alter the processes by which they conduct strategic planning and environmental scanning activities (Julian & Ofori-Dankwa;Kerby & Weber, 2000;Yunker, 2000). Taking a deliberately provocative stance in their 2006 article, Julian and Ofori-Dankwa fuelled the discussion by boldly claiming that the influence of external accrediting bodies is negative and "profound" (p. 225), referring to this phenomenon as an accreditocracy.…”
Section: Background: Business School Accreditation Possible Negative mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They cited many negative effects: accreditation has influenced business school staffing, research, and curriculum policies (Gore, Steven, & Bailey, 1998;Henninger, 1994) and caused schools to alter the processes by which they conduct strategic planning and environmental scanning activities (Julian & Ofori-Dankwa;Kerby & Weber, 2000;Yunker, 2000). Taking a deliberately provocative stance in their 2006 article, Julian and Ofori-Dankwa fuelled the discussion by boldly claiming that the influence of external accrediting bodies is negative and "profound" (p. 225), referring to this phenomenon as an accreditocracy.…”
Section: Background: Business School Accreditation Possible Negative mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even choosing to compare an institution's scores only against others accredited by or members of its accrediting agency, however, is problematic if there are considerable quality differences across these institutions. Yunker (2000), Corcoran (2006), and Francisco, Noland, and Sinclair (2008) show such differences for AACSB-accredited institutions.…”
Section: The Unknown Comparison Groupmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Gaining and maintaining accreditation is of great importance to colleges and schools (Yunker 2000). In this process, assessment is used to gauge the goals and objectives or the college and school.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%