2001
DOI: 10.1002/pse.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration serviceability of timber floors in residential construction

Abstract: The main focus of this review is the chronological development of design approaches to minimize excessive vibrations in residential timber floors. To aid readers in understanding the fundamental issues, factors affecting human response to floor vibrations are discussed. Discussion also covers the link between these factors and floor construction details. The final section of the review discusses unresolved codification issues. A general conclusion is that, while each of the design approaches reviewed has achie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hu et al [19][20][21] have carried out in situ tests on hundreds of floors in Canada during extensive research programs, first in the 1980s and then in the late 1990s, to develop serviceability design criteria for timber floors. The average damping ratio found for joist floors with a concrete topping was 3.6%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al [19][20][21] have carried out in situ tests on hundreds of floors in Canada during extensive research programs, first in the 1980s and then in the late 1990s, to develop serviceability design criteria for timber floors. The average damping ratio found for joist floors with a concrete topping was 3.6%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In North America, wood-framed construction is common for residential housings, making timber floor vibration control an interesting research area. Many approaches to preventing timber floor vibration have been developed by researchers, which has been summarized by Hu and Chui, 2001. There are six approaches, namely, limit on uniform distributed live-load deflection, limit on point-load deflection, limit on point-load deflection and peak-velocity due to unit impulse, limit on fundamental frequency and frequency-weighted root-mean-square acceleration, limit on fundamental natural frequency, and limit on a combination of the parameters mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both cooling and heating can operate on a number of SMA elements and, after combination, an effective tuning frequency and enough damping capacity are expected to be achieved. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 f 1 (Hz) (2) T ( o C) (3) k 2 (N/m) (4) ξ 2 (%) (5) m 2 (kg) (6) f 2 (Hz) (1) mass attached to the steel cantilever beam (2) natural frequency of the main structure (3) working temperature of the SMA beam (4) stiffness of the SMA beam (5) equivalent damping ratio of the SMA beam (6) mass attached to the SMA beam (7) natural frequency of the TMD 1 2 3 4 5 ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%