2011
DOI: 10.3130/jaabe.10.407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Testing and Investigation of the Dynamic Performance and Comfort of Timber Floors

Abstract: Field tests were conducted on timber floors in three wood-framed buildings in order to obtain their dynamic characteristics and evaluate the vibration comfort. The measured fundamental vibration frequency, damping ratio and root-mean-square acceleration, were used to evaluate human comfort caused by timber floor vibration. The results show that the fundamental vibration period of the thirteen tested timber floors was between 9.96Hz and 18.70Hz, which is sufficiently outside the frequency range of human activit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The damping ratios found both for the laboratory floors and the in-situ floors are higher than those indicated by other researchers. As stated before, the ranges of damping ratios reported by other studies were between 0.52% and 4.78% for laboratory floors [3][4][5][6][7][8] and between 0.47% and 9.10% for in-situ floors [9][10][11][12]. These values contrast to some extent with the ranges reported in the present study, which were between 1.9% and 4.9% for laboratory floors and from 4.3% to 14.8% for in-situ floors.…”
Section: Fundamental Damping Ratioscontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The damping ratios found both for the laboratory floors and the in-situ floors are higher than those indicated by other researchers. As stated before, the ranges of damping ratios reported by other studies were between 0.52% and 4.78% for laboratory floors [3][4][5][6][7][8] and between 0.47% and 9.10% for in-situ floors [9][10][11][12]. These values contrast to some extent with the ranges reported in the present study, which were between 1.9% and 4.9% for laboratory floors and from 4.3% to 14.8% for in-situ floors.…”
Section: Fundamental Damping Ratioscontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The damping ratios obtained for the first resonant mode varied between 0.47% and 9.10%. Subsequently, with the rise of industrialized construction, other researchers concentrated on studying the damping ratios of prefabricated timber floors for eight-story timber frame residential buildings [11] and five-story multi-family apartment buildings [12]. These floors generally had a main resistant structure composed of CLT slab panels and glulam beams, which often interacted with sophisticated ceiling systems and lightweight partition walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last six years, the field studies conducted by Parnell, Davis & Xu (2010) and Xiong, Kang & Lu (2011) stand out. In the first study, the vibration performance of different construction typologies of lightweight floors with cold-formed metallic beams was evaluated.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then they decrease as the damage accumulates (Xing et al, 2010). Field tests have been conducted to investigate the vibration frequency, damping ratio, and root-mean-square acceleration, all of which should be considered during design (Xiong et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%