2017
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2017.2766563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Transistor With n-Bridge and Body on Gate for Low-Power 1T-DRAM Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimizing L CG /L T is advantageous as RFET exhibits higher retention (6.1 s for L S /L T = 0.4 (L CG /L T = 0.3), 8.7 s for L S /L T = 0.6 (L CG /L T = 0.5), 3.95 s for L S /L T = 0.8 (L CG /L T = 0.4)) as compared to previously reported data. RFET based 1T-DRAM with L T = 50 nm (L S /L T = 0.6 and L CG /L T = 0.4) exhibits a good RT of 175 ms (>64 ms) at 85 • C which shows potential for extending [27], twin gate (2G) [50], and L-shaped (L) [28] tunnel FET (TFET), Z 2 FET [31], Ultrathin BOX [51], impact ionization MOS (IMOS) [30], n-bridge and body-on-gate (BOG) FET [52], electron-bridge channel (ECB) FET [53], 3G-RFET [32], and 2G-RFET [33] based 1T-DRAM with our results at 85 • C. multifunctional attributes of RFET through the implementation of standalone 1T-DRAM.…”
Section: Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Optimizing L CG /L T is advantageous as RFET exhibits higher retention (6.1 s for L S /L T = 0.4 (L CG /L T = 0.3), 8.7 s for L S /L T = 0.6 (L CG /L T = 0.5), 3.95 s for L S /L T = 0.8 (L CG /L T = 0.4)) as compared to previously reported data. RFET based 1T-DRAM with L T = 50 nm (L S /L T = 0.6 and L CG /L T = 0.4) exhibits a good RT of 175 ms (>64 ms) at 85 • C which shows potential for extending [27], twin gate (2G) [50], and L-shaped (L) [28] tunnel FET (TFET), Z 2 FET [31], Ultrathin BOX [51], impact ionization MOS (IMOS) [30], n-bridge and body-on-gate (BOG) FET [52], electron-bridge channel (ECB) FET [53], 3G-RFET [32], and 2G-RFET [33] based 1T-DRAM with our results at 85 • C. multifunctional attributes of RFET through the implementation of standalone 1T-DRAM.…”
Section: Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 15(a [27], TFETs (twin gate (2G) [50], and L-shaped (L) [28]), Z 2 FET [31], Ultra-thin BOX [51], I-MOS [30], n-bridge and body-on-gate (BOG) vertical FET [52], Electron-bridge channel (ECB) FET [53], and RFETs [32,33]). Optimizing L CG /L T is advantageous as RFET exhibits higher retention (6.1 s for L S /L T = 0.4 (L CG /L T = 0.3), 8.7 s for L S /L T = 0.6 (L CG /L T = 0.5), 3.95 s for L S /L T = 0.8 (L CG /L T = 0.4)) as compared to previously reported data.…”
Section: Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method is different from impact ionization or gate-induced drain leakage (GIDL) used in the previous 1T DRAM devices. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]…”
Section: Device Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, planar 1T-DRAM still exhibits poor retention time. Therefore, various structures and methods for improving the memory characteristic have been investigated [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%