Abstract:Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more
“…It had done so until 2006 although accompanied by the note that 'data on aid to manufacturing may be overestimated' 13 . The reason for this is that the Commission used to include various types of horizontal aid into the calculation of aid to the manufacturing because most horizontal aid can be assumed to target the manufacturing sector (see also Gual and Jódar, 2006). So the allocation of most horizontal aid measures is based on an assumption and not on actual data since horizontal state aid data by sector is not available.…”
Section: Overview Of State Aid To the Manufacturing Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively low and declining share of sector-specific aid is to a certain extent due to the Commission's preference for horizontal aid. Therefore it may be assumed that a good part of the aid measures notified as horizontal aid is de facto sector-specific aid (see also Gual and Jódar, 2006). This is why we operate with a composite measure of manufacturing aid that is far broader than sector-specific aid to the manufacturing sector.…”
Section: Overview Of State Aid To the Manufacturing Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the election variable we can assume that governments are more prone to pay out subsidies when there are elections to be held in the same year. Our choice of instruments is partly similar to that of Gual and Jódar (2006) insofar as we have a set of instruments reflecting the political system albeit the actual instrumental variables are different. We also differ with respect to the second set of instruments where we opt for government expenditures whereas Gual and Jódar (2006) use state aid provided to other sectors as instrumental variables.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the focus on the manufacturing sector our paper is also related to Gual and Jódar (2006). They argue that the majority of horizontal aid provided by Member States is de facto sectoral aid to the manufacturing sector and analyse the effects of manufacturing aid (as a share of value added) on total factor productivity (TFP) growth for a sample of eleven Member States over the period 1995-2003.…”
Despite the proclaimed return of industrial policy (Wade, 2012) state aid provided by EU Member States remains at a historically low level. This is partly explained by the unique institutional arrangement in the EU which empowers the European Commission to monitor and restrict state aid activities of Member States. Making use of European state aid statistics over the period 1995-2011 we employ an augmented macroeconomic export function to investigate the relationship between state aid for the manufacturing sector and Member States' export performance. With manufacturing value added exports serving as a proxy for export performance, our model suggests that a 10% increase in manufacturing aid increases exports by 0.67% for the average EU country. The result is confirmed by instrumental variable estimation. We also find that the impact of state aid on exports is increasing with government effectiveness leading to large differences in the leverage of aid expenditures to promote export performance across Member States.
“…It had done so until 2006 although accompanied by the note that 'data on aid to manufacturing may be overestimated' 13 . The reason for this is that the Commission used to include various types of horizontal aid into the calculation of aid to the manufacturing because most horizontal aid can be assumed to target the manufacturing sector (see also Gual and Jódar, 2006). So the allocation of most horizontal aid measures is based on an assumption and not on actual data since horizontal state aid data by sector is not available.…”
Section: Overview Of State Aid To the Manufacturing Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively low and declining share of sector-specific aid is to a certain extent due to the Commission's preference for horizontal aid. Therefore it may be assumed that a good part of the aid measures notified as horizontal aid is de facto sector-specific aid (see also Gual and Jódar, 2006). This is why we operate with a composite measure of manufacturing aid that is far broader than sector-specific aid to the manufacturing sector.…”
Section: Overview Of State Aid To the Manufacturing Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the election variable we can assume that governments are more prone to pay out subsidies when there are elections to be held in the same year. Our choice of instruments is partly similar to that of Gual and Jódar (2006) insofar as we have a set of instruments reflecting the political system albeit the actual instrumental variables are different. We also differ with respect to the second set of instruments where we opt for government expenditures whereas Gual and Jódar (2006) use state aid provided to other sectors as instrumental variables.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the focus on the manufacturing sector our paper is also related to Gual and Jódar (2006). They argue that the majority of horizontal aid provided by Member States is de facto sectoral aid to the manufacturing sector and analyse the effects of manufacturing aid (as a share of value added) on total factor productivity (TFP) growth for a sample of eleven Member States over the period 1995-2003.…”
Despite the proclaimed return of industrial policy (Wade, 2012) state aid provided by EU Member States remains at a historically low level. This is partly explained by the unique institutional arrangement in the EU which empowers the European Commission to monitor and restrict state aid activities of Member States. Making use of European state aid statistics over the period 1995-2011 we employ an augmented macroeconomic export function to investigate the relationship between state aid for the manufacturing sector and Member States' export performance. With manufacturing value added exports serving as a proxy for export performance, our model suggests that a 10% increase in manufacturing aid increases exports by 0.67% for the average EU country. The result is confirmed by instrumental variable estimation. We also find that the impact of state aid on exports is increasing with government effectiveness leading to large differences in the leverage of aid expenditures to promote export performance across Member States.
“…In the first category are studies which investigate the effects of industrial policy at the country level; in the second category, industrial policy is examined at the firm level. Gual and Jodar‐Rosell (); Aghion et al () and Stöllinger and Holzner () fall into the first category. Since the main instrument of industrial policy in the European Union countries is state aid, all of these studies consider state aid as their main independent variable.…”
Industrial policy is an important tool of economic policy-making, and this has been the case especially since the onset of the current global financial crisis in 2008. However, only relatively few empirical studies consider the macroeconomic effects of industrial policy, especially for European Union countries. In this study we investigate the effect of state aid policy on economic growth and investment, using a panel data set which covers 27 European Union countries over the period 1992-2011. Our results suggest that state aid policy is not an effective tool to achieve higher economic growth and investment rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.