2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10842-016-0222-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Aid and Export Competitiveness in the EU

Abstract: Despite the proclaimed return of industrial policy (Wade, 2012) state aid provided by EU Member States remains at a historically low level. This is partly explained by the unique institutional arrangement in the EU which empowers the European Commission to monitor and restrict state aid activities of Member States. Making use of European state aid statistics over the period 1995-2011 we employ an augmented macroeconomic export function to investigate the relationship between state aid for the manufacturing sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While in practice each case needs to be looked at in detail, some general conclusions emerge, if we deliberately condition our considerations on the initial intensity of competition in the market: -Cases in antitrust and merger control typically are subject to closer investigation only when there already is reason to suspect a low level of initial competition. As a general rule, we should hence find most cases in the upward sloping part of the inverted-U, and expect that innovation also benefits from a strict application to maintain a high 22 See, e.g., Rodrik (2008), Farla (2015), or Stoellinger and Holzner (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in practice each case needs to be looked at in detail, some general conclusions emerge, if we deliberately condition our considerations on the initial intensity of competition in the market: -Cases in antitrust and merger control typically are subject to closer investigation only when there already is reason to suspect a low level of initial competition. As a general rule, we should hence find most cases in the upward sloping part of the inverted-U, and expect that innovation also benefits from a strict application to maintain a high 22 See, e.g., Rodrik (2008), Farla (2015), or Stoellinger and Holzner (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we understand development as the combination of growth and qualitative transformations (Schumpeter, 1947), policy must seek dialogue with the stakeholders in place, who have expertise about the specific industrial structures and institutions that shape the formation of competitive advantages. 23 Because of the asymmetric distribution of information, however, such a dialogue also 23 See, e.g., Rodrik (2008), Farla (2015) or Stoellinger and Holzner (2016). Interestingly, it is the nonlinear nature of the inverted-U hypothesis that can resolve much of the mystery also for policy-making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In estimating the empirical relationship between state aid for export and export performance in EU-15 and Turkey, Görg et al (2005), Wilkison and Brouthers (2006), Martincus and Carballo (2010), Aghion et al (2011), Jalali (2012, Buts and Jegers (2013) and Stöllinger and Holzner (2013) was used. The functional form of the model is specified below in Eq.…”
Section: Econometric Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%