2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10273-012-1413-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verteilungswirkungen des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative distributional effects are also an issue of concern. The 10% of households with the lowest income pay about 1% of their available income to finance the REA, whereas the same share among the households with the highest income is only 0,17% (Techert, Niehues and Bardt, 2012). Yet, based on purchasing power and in the long term the cost burden on households and firms has changed little.…”
Section: B) Achievements To Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative distributional effects are also an issue of concern. The 10% of households with the lowest income pay about 1% of their available income to finance the REA, whereas the same share among the households with the highest income is only 0,17% (Techert, Niehues and Bardt, 2012). Yet, based on purchasing power and in the long term the cost burden on households and firms has changed little.…”
Section: B) Achievements To Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei den privaten Haushalten, insbesondere den einkommensschwachen Haushalten sind die Ausgaben für Energie in den letzten Jahren stetig gestiegenund zwar stärker als bei reicheren Haushalten (siehe Heindl 2014). So begünstigt zum Beispiel das EEG obere Einkommensschichten und wirkt regressiv (Techert et al 2012). Im Hinblick auf Bürgerbeteiligung an erneuerbaren Energien-Anlagen stehen vor allem Fragen wie die Bedeutung privater Investitionen im Verhältnis zu öffentlichen Investitionen sowie Instrumente und deren Anreizwirkung für private Investitionen im Mittelpunkt (Yildiz 2014).…”
Section: Energiekonzept 2011unclassified
“…The EEG-levy exceptions for industry c have been repeatedly expanded in the past. They should -independent of the requirements of European law -rapidly be limited to a realistically tenable amount that is aligned on the proven dangers to international or intermodal competitiveness [21,22,24]. A company's energy consumption, the measure currently used by the EEG, is an unsuitable indicator for this purpose.…”
Section: Keeping An Eye On the Social Distribution Of Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social consequences of the energy transition policy should always be taken into consideration, yet without playing off social policy against energy, environmental, and climate policy [30][31][32]. Those who are socially weak must be able to keep up during the restructuring of the energy system.…”
Section: Maintaining a Social Balancementioning
confidence: 99%